Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />..c:.' <br />w <br />~ <br /> <br />-10- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />However, the majority of the conclusions were extrapolated <br />from results of studies on the Green River drainage in Utah; <br />Riley and Jurinak (1979) extended this work and suggest <br />approximate salt loading rates from the various areas in the <br />Upper Basin. A good summary of past and present research <br />and other salinity control programs of the Water and Power <br />Resources Service is contained in the most recent biannual <br />report, Progress Report No.9, Quality of Water, Colo~ado <br />River Basin (USDI, BR, 1979a). <br />Differences among the various studies have been <br />inevitable and have been primarily centered around quantita- <br />tive historical salinity conditions, salt loadings, concen- <br />trating effects and respective magnitude of contribution <br />from the various sources and combinations of sources. These <br />numerical differences have been the result of nonuniformity <br />in data sets, procedures, assumptions, and, sometimes, <br />incorrect extrapolation of events and/or data. However, the <br />general qualitative conclusions and the stated needs. for <br />control of most of these studies are basically similar. The <br />major sources of salinity are nonpoint natural sources, <br />irrigation nonpoint sources, natural and man-made point <br />sources, reservoir evaporation, out-of-basin transfers and <br />municipal and industrial uses. These studies will be men- <br />tioned in succeeding paragraphs where pertinent. There have <br />also been studies similar to this one and a brief review of <br />these may be helpful insetting forth the contributions of <br />this work. <br />