Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o <br />~ <br />N <br />-oJ <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />more than 850 mg/l at Imperial Darn. Further deterioration <br />of Colorado River quality is expected as a result of water <br />and energy resource development. This will occur even if <br />salinity reduction measures are instituted although it would <br />occur at a slower rate. If no salinity control measures are <br />developed, it is anticipated that salinity increases at <br />Imperial Darn will range from 1,150 mg/l (USDI, BR, 1979a) to <br />11340 mg/l (Colorado River Board of California, 1970) by the <br />year 2000. <br />All of the salinity control planning which has been done <br />to date has been oriented toward only reducing the salt load <br />of the Colorado River. The economics of control have not <br />been of overriding concern. Furthermore, development of <br />cost-effective programs or the construction of projects with <br />),enefit-cost ratios greater than one has not been high prior- <br />ity even though costs have been compared to estimated annual <br />damages at Imperial Darn. The argument presented in favor of <br />the non-economic approach is that Congress (PL 93-320) man- <br />dated certain projects and that these projects would include <br />specific construction items such as canal linings. However, <br />since that legislation was passed the results of numerous <br />investigations have become available which permit the <br />formulation of cost-effective salinity control programs. <br />The control of salinity on the scale needed in the <br />Colorado River Basin will undoubtedly involve a combination <br />of several individual control measures in each area of <br />salinity contribution. For any specific source of salinity, <br />