Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'1 ", ~i '1 ., q <br />..' ,." ~.~ y OJ '.. <br /> <br />(1984 Amendment). Reinforcing the Salinity Program's general deference to state water law <br />is detailed language in various contracts and documents pertaining to the Grand Valley Unit <br />wherein the United States disclaimed any right to the salvaged or saved water, leaving the <br />allocation of any such water to be decided under state law. "Nothing in this contract shall <br />be construed to alter, amend, modify, or conflict with the right of the Association to make <br />use of all water adjudicated for use within the Gravity Division in a manner consistent with <br />the laws and constitution of the State of Colorado; provided, however, that any water saved <br />by the rehabilitation and operation of project facilities may be applied only to those lands <br />within the Gravity Division which are classified as irrigable...in a manner which shall not <br />result in any material increase of salinity inflow to the Colorado River." Grand Valley <br />Water Users Association-USBR Contract for Rehabilitation, Operation, and Maintenance <br />of Distribution Facilities, April 10, 1986. "The Districts have agreed not to use this saved <br />water [an estimated 1,760 AF per year from reduced seepage] in a manner which would <br />materially increase the salinity contribution to the Colorado River. Beyond that <br />requirement, the (sic) Reclamation and the salinity program defer to Colorado State Water <br />law to determine the destiny of the salvaged water." Price-Stub Ditch Improvements, Draft <br />Environmental Assessment, June 1990, page 16. <br /> <br />Participants in the program agree not to use the improved systems or saved water in <br />any way that would cause additional salt loading to the river. This agreement effectively <br />prevents participants from using "saved water" to add new irrigated acres uriaer an improved <br />ditch system. Colorado water law similarly would prevent use of an existing decreed right <br />on new irrigated acres as an expanded use. <br /> <br />Environmental impacts caused by improved irrigation systems must be mitigated to <br />some degree. The USBR is required to provide replacement of wetland and wildlife habitat <br />to offset the losses to these values caused by the improved conveyances it is constructing. <br />Participants in the SCS program are encouraged to participate in a voluntary program to <br />replace wetland and wildlife habitat lost as a result of the program. <br /> <br />IV. Availability of Salvage or Saved Water in the Grand Valley <br /> <br />The Bureau and the SCS have been analyzing salt loading and water use in the <br />Grand Valley since the early 1970's. Hydrosalinity models analyze water use and salt <br />movement by measuring and projecting water flows and salt concentrations at various Sages <br />in the Grand Valley. The model is based on a mass balance approach that tracks all water <br />and salt inflows into the valley, accounts for water use in the valley, and checks against <br />known outflows. The Bureau and SCS then formulate and design project features to reduce <br />saline return flows in the most effective manner by targeting those areas that produce the <br />highest salt load. These plans have been developed in phases, and refined bast1d On <br />experience and data gained from earlier phases. Table 2 summarizes the current <br />components of Stage II of the Grand Valley Salinity Control Unit. <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />r "i. <br />; <br />q .'; c>t.-.';';,.A, (.__,.Jii__'~:"-,(}i\o.ciA, ,_~,-~ <br />