Laserfiche WebLink
<br />29 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />USBR 1989 Dolores Project Final Supplement to Final EIS and <br />~ Appendix B on Water Supply /Hydrosalinity. <br />~ <br />~ Summary and extracts from the published USBR EIS and appendicies. <br />~y <br />With the completion of the Dolores Project by USBR the salt load <br />in the outflow of McElmo Creek would increase to 174,000 tons <br />(p.53) of salt annually. with USBR salinity control features the <br />proposed plan shows outflow of 82,000 acre feet with a salt load <br />of 147,000 tons. This is a concentration of 1300 mg/l, which <br />compares to the present average concentration of 2600 mg/l. The <br />flow diagram shows about 34,000 acre feet of good quality (156 <br />mg/l) inflow being spilled into the outflow of McElmo Creek, <br />thereby diluting the concentration of outflow in half. <br /> <br />Canal inflow into Montezuma Valley would increase from about <br />105,000 acre feet to 139,000 acre feet per year. With a <br />concentration of 156 mg/l or .2 tons per acre foot, canal inflow <br />to the Montezuma Valley carries 30,000 tons of salt. The total <br />salt pickup from the area without salinity control would be <br />144,000 tons/year. The salt load pickup from the irrigated area <br />with the USBR Dolores Project to deliver additional water, but <br />including a salinity control plan would be 118,000 tons. <br /> <br />Salt loading comes from both irrigation and diffuse sources, with <br />irrigation being the main contributor. The local contribution <br />from precipitation is estimated to be 13,000 acre feet and 39,500 <br />tons per year (USBR 1988. Appendix B Water Supply/Hyrosalinity <br />p.56). Natural runoff and salt loading is not expected to change <br />with project activities. <br /> <br />The irrigation budget displayed on page 52 & 53 assumes 73 % <br />onfarm application efficiency for preproject and future without <br />project and a 67 % efficiency for future with salinity control. <br />These values need some explanation and a reference. <br /> <br />The following data was abstracted from USBR Appendix B dated <br />January, 1988. pp. 52,53,56,58. <br /> Canal Ditch T. W. Deep Subtot Phreat. Return <br /> Seep. Seep. Seep percol. Use <br /> Thousand acre feet <br />Pre 10 6 6 8 30 -12 18 <br />F/WO 12 7 6 9 34 -13 ?1 <br />F/W 6 7 6 9 28 -11 17 <br /> <br />Note: About 40 percent of the seepage and deep percolation is <br />consumed by phreatophytes or wetland habitat. SCS inventory <br />would place the value closer to 20 percent (4000 acres at 1.5 <br />AF/A would be 6,000 acre feet.) <br />