Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 2 <br />Average Annual (1938-1957) Ditch Diversions <br />acre-feet <br /> <br />Ditch <br /> <br />Total Ditch Diversions <br /> <br />Applicant's Diversions <br /> <br />Pioneer Union <br /> <br />2,881.8 <br />581.7 <br />3,463.5 <br /> <br />524.8 <br />47.3 <br />572.1 <br /> <br />Hodgson <br />Totals <br /> <br />11.3 Potential Crop Consumptive Use <br /> <br />Two commonly used methods for detennining potential crop consumptive use are the Modified <br />Blaney-Criddle method and the Jensen-Haise method. Though the Blaney-Criddle method is easy <br />to apply since it is based on historic mean daily temperatures and precipitation, it is generally <br />considered to provide consumptive use estimates that are significantly lower than values that <br />would be measured in the field without calibrated crop coefficients. The primary reason for <br />underestimating consumptive use is that the Blaney-Criddle method fails to consider high daytime <br />radiation that can occur even when mean daily temperatures are low. <br /> <br />The Jensen-Haise method uses a more detailed equation that considers temperature and solar <br />radiation, A major drawback in the application of this method is the lack of historic solar <br />radiation data in the vicinity of the served acreage, The Jensen-Haise method generally results <br />in higher consumptive use estimates than the Blaney-Criddle method, <br /> <br />Based on our research, and experience in other cases, we believe that a reasonable estimate of <br />potential consumptive use would be the average of results obtained from the Blaney-Criddle and <br />Jensen-Haise methods, The average of the two methods recognizes the Blaney-Criddle <br />underestimate of potential consumptive use and also the inclusion of a radiation term in the <br />analysis. <br /> <br />Analysis of both methods with climatic data from the Denver WSFO AP Station, approximately <br />16 miles northeast of the acreage served by the subject water rights, indicates that the Jensen- <br />Haise method provides results approximately 40 percent greater than the Blaney-Criddle method <br />for the 1951-1980 period, Based on an average of the two methods, we have adopted a potential <br />crop consumptive use of 120 percent of the Blaney-Criddle results using the Edgewater climate <br />station data for the study period 1938-1957. This station is approximately 8 miles northeast of <br />the acreage served by the subject water rights. <br /> <br />Table 3 provides a summary of the potential consumptive use of irrigation water by the various <br />historic crops. Monthly results of the multiplication product of the potential crop consumptive <br />use and the served acreages are shown in Tables A-3 and A-4 (Appendix A) for the subject water <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />~ Leonard Rice Consulllng Water Engineers, Inc. <br />