My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04539
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04539
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:57 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:25:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.750
Description
San Juan River General
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
5/31/1961
Author
Sidney L McFarland
Title
Water Supply for the San Juan-Chama Reclamation Project and the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~j)nnsn <br /> <br />WATER SUPPLY FOR THE SAN JUAN-CmMA PROJECT <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />j>,..-"' <br /> <br />The balance of 1,697,000 acre-feet anticipated to be made by year <br />2062 would be for potential projects not presently identified. Pre- <br />liminary data for the section 2 projects shown in Public Law 485, <br />exclusive of those identified in the foregoing tabulation, indicate a <br />total depletion of about 800,000 acre-feet. There will probably.be <br />some additional use by non-Federal developments for municipal and <br />industrial purposes in various parts of the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />The studies show that with an average annual depletion of 6.2 <br />million acre-feet including reservoir losses (2020 conditions), the aver- <br />age annual release from Glen Canyon Reservoir would be about 9.1 <br />million acre-feet. It is the Bureau's position that, to realize upper. <br />basin uses which would deplete the flows at Lee Ferry beyond an <br />average of about 6,200,000 acre-feet annually would require addi- <br />tional holdover storage reservoirs in the upper basin, and that, as <br />need therefor can be demonstrated, it is presumed that the .additional <br />reservoirs contemplated in the ultimate plan will be authorized, <br />construe Led, and operated. In summary, the Bureau estimates that <br />authorized storage units provide sufficient storage for expected de-, <br />pletions in the upper basin during the next 100 years. <br /> <br />Co'mments and conclusions <br />Water operation studies show how a project is expected to be <br />operated under future water conditions. They assume a repetition <br />of past flow conditions for a particular period. This is the most <br />accurate and reliable method available for predicting the future water <br />supply situation and planning the project operation. While it can <br />be said that the longest period of record, assuming reliable data, will <br />produce the most accurate estimate of the future average annual flow <br />conditions, it is the extended drought conditions which occur during <br />the overall period which become the critical factor in project design, <br />in determining the storage needed, etc. <br />'1'he first conclusion that can be drawn from my examination of the <br />operation studies summarized above is that there are no appreciable <br />dIscrepancies in these studies so far as physical data are concerned. <br />The different end results are produced by using different periods of <br />study, different assumptions, etc. Of course, the studies were made <br />for different purposes and had different objectives. <br />For example, the State of Colorado had the Hill study made be- <br />cause of its concern as to whether water was available in the quantities <br />proposed for transmountain diversion and at the same time meet the <br />future needs in that part of the State west of the Continental Divide. <br />The Hill study was intended to produce a safe or conservative estimate <br />of water available. Yet the results of the Hill study are more favor- <br />able to the upper baSin than the results of the Bureau of ReclamatiOn <br />studies which are used for planning purposes. Mr. Hill concluded <br />on the basis of a 22-year period of study during which the historicai <br />runoff at Lee Ferry "averaged only 11.7 million acre-feet per year and <br />assuming 21 million acre-feet of reservoir capacity, that upper basin <br />depletions could amount to 6.2 million acre-feet per year. In com- <br />parison, the Bureau came up with the same depletion figure for plan- <br />ning purposes on the basis of a 54-year period of study (during which <br />the historical flow at Lee Ferry averaged about 13,620,000 acre-feet) <br />with the storage capacity provided by the authorized units (26,853,000 <br />acre-feet initially, with 22,443,000 acre-feet remaining in the year 2062). <br />10389-l61~ <br /> <br />c.". <br /> <br />. "~ <br />~:~_: '\,~:' <br /> <br />-',:" <br /> <br />~, J',~- "<"c <br /> <br /> <br />'_.i.' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.