Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />.'." , <br />,1" <br /> <br />ODJJSS <br /> <br /> <br />WATER SUPPLY FOR THE' SAN JUAN-CHAMA PROJECT 11 <br /> <br />other uses, including exportation, at 28,800 acre-feet. . In summary, <br />he shows the stream depletions from the San 'Juan River runoff result- <br />ing from presently developed use in the basin in Colorado to be 146,000 <br />acre-feet and estimates the potential future stream depletion require- <br />ment for full basin development in Colorado to be an additional <br />163,000 acre-feet, resulting in an estimate of total ultimate stream <br />depletion of 309,000 acre-feet for uses iil Colorado. <br />During the hearings, Mr,Reynolds and Mr, Sparks were questioned <br />about an operation study prepared by the Colorado Water Conserva- <br />tion Board entitled "Navajo Reservoir and San Juan-Chama Study <br />I-A." This study has been placed in the record of the hearings. <br />The study covers the period of 1943 to 1956 during which historic <br />flows at Blanco, less 45,000 acre-feet for possible future use, averaged <br />only 733,200 acre-feet annually compared with 1,095,600 acre-feet <br />annually for the period 1914-58. After diversions for the initial <br />stage of the San Juan-Chama, the demands on the reservoir were <br />indicated to total 785,000 acre-feet, comprising 508,000 acre~feet for <br />Navajo irrigation project, .23,000 for Hamrr.ond project, 224,000 for <br />municipal and industrial supply, 96,000 for other Indian uses, 34,000 <br />for reservoir evaporation, and an allowance of 100,000 acre-feet <br />annually for usable return flows. The results of the study showed <br />the reservoir completely empty in 4 years and New Mexico demands <br />exceeding its entitlement (assumed to be 787,000 acre-feet annually) <br />when water was available and suffering heavy shortages in the last <br />years of the study. .' <br />Mr. Sparks testified that this study was designed only to reflect <br />the worst sequence of years of record that could be found and that <br />it was deliberately stopped in 1956 because 1957 was a year of very <br />high flow. He stated that this period was designed to get a progressive <br />lO-year series during the most critical history of the river and pointed <br />out that during this period the river flowed only at 65 percent of the <br />normal flow. Mr. Sparks pointed out that in the study he had de- <br />liberately created conditions which he believed could not exist and <br />that this was done for the purpose of attempting to create a shortage <br />against Colorado. The assumptions were continually revised and <br />the demands increased until a shortage on the river was forced. <br />He stated that when that shortagl) was reached the conditions as~ <br />sumed were completely absurd. The study was designed to show <br />that the New Mexico projects could not have any adverse effect on <br />the Animas-La Plata project. in Colorado. <br /> <br />Upper Oolorado River Oommission studies <br />The staff of the Upper Colorado River Commission has completed a, <br />study covering the availability of water in the San Juan Basin. <br />The study covers the water supplies for the San Juan-Chama project, <br />initial phase, the Navajo Indian irrigation project, and the Animas- <br />La Plata project, and the overall effects of these projects on the water <br />supply of the San Juan River basin during the critical period~942-56. <br />In the Navajo Reservoir operations, potential upstream depletions <br />are assumed for the authorized Pine River extension project (62,800 <br />acre-feet) and the Weminuche Pass diversion project (18,600 acre- <br />feet). When added to the average annual depletion for the initial <br />phase of the San Juan-Chama project (105,100 acre-feet), the total <br />potential upstream depletions would average 186,500 acre-feet <br />annually. <br />