Laserfiche WebLink
<br />May 1982- <br />Issue #3 <br /> <br />~H:EK~:fl. flOi':~ L;,'lIT <br />COLORADO RIV[R WATER QIIAI,lTY r~.II'R.OVF.MENT PROr.RAM <br />PLAN:-ll~G n:AM NI':\~Su:rrEfl. <br /> <br /> <br />.5 n~wsl~tter summdri7.es the r~sul tll of the verificl1- <br />tion pr')~r.lm vn the ~l<'(~k,u nOln~ Hnit. Tho:: Fin.ll Verifi- <br />cation Program Report was cl)(Tlpl<.!teo by CH2~1 Hill in <br />Dec~mher 1981. InflJnn.1tlon on the monitoring n.:'twork <br />and the activity on the Scott, Marland, and Jaln.:'s Wdls <br />..:;::::.. was presented in Issue 1~2 of the planning team news- <br />~ Letter. <br /> <br />~ BACKGROUND <br />~ <br /> <br />The saLine seepage problem at Meeker Dome WAS believed <br />to be the result of unplugged or inadequately plugeed <br />oil test wells. Reclamatlon's consultant. CH2M Hill <br />Central Inc.. carried out a verification program to test <br />this hypothesis. six observation t.,'l2lls and eight seep <br />measurement stations were installed in 1980 to monitor <br />ground-water level and flows. A testing progra,n was <br />initiated for three old oil explorRtion wells. By June <br />16, 1981. two wells were cleaned out and plugged; a <br />third well was assumed to be plugger! through an inter- <br />cept well. <br /> <br />HYPOTHESIS VERIFICATION <br /> <br />Data obtained in the course of the Meeker Dam.:! investi- <br />gation have supported the hypothesis that saline water <br />from deep confined aqui fers is reaching the surface by <br />rechar~ing shallow, poorly-confined aquifers via old <br />well bores. <br /> <br />Information Obtained During the Verification Program <br /> <br />~re is a shallow aqui fer in the upper Morrison Fonna- <br />n charged with sal int! water under fairly high head <br />ich llnderlie~ mo.sr, if not all, of the Dome. The <br />aquifer is within 60 feet of the surface ne<lr the Meeker <br />Well. The 800-foot-deep Meeker Well. drillE:d in the <br />early 1900's, penetrated aquifers in the Entrada Forma- <br />tion. Meeker Well flowed into the White River at <br />approxim<ltely 1,200 gpm for nearly 50 years. The Mar- <br />land Well, drilled in 1925, encountered flowing \.iate.r in <br />the Entrada and deeper formations to a depth of 2,000 <br />feet. Each progressively deeper aquifer contained water <br />that was higher in mineralization, temperature, and <br />pressure. The Weber Formation from 1.800 to 2,000 feet <br />yielded the highest pressure and flow and contained the <br />saltiest water. <br /> <br />Flows at the Meeker WeJ.1 responded to the interaquifer <br />connection between th~ Weber and Entrada Formalions as a <br />result of the M<lrland Hell. Both wells flowed simul- <br />taneously for several ye':Hs before the Marland t.lell <br />ceased flowing because of a partial well bore collRpse, <br />intentional plugging with debris, and/or the graclu<ll <br />bleed-off of pressure by the flowing wells. The Meeker <br />Well continued to floW" until 1968, when it was plugged. <br />Represnurizat ion occurred in tbe Ent rada and lower form- <br />ations which resulted in sufficient pressure recovery at <br />the Harland Well to push water to the surface. Insuffi- <br />cient casing and corrosion of th~ casing resulted in <br />conditions at the Marland Well whl~l-e shallow aquifers <br />were intcrcp.pting lal"ge qllAntities of the Silline wat€r <br />moving up the borehole from the deep aquifers. As shal- <br />low formations were invaded by water from a deeper m~jor <br />aquifer, w;lter quality in 1111 zones became nearly iden- <br />IIIlIIiii.cal. <br /> <br />Wteraquifer connections along deep f.lults, if in exis- <br />tence <It all, did not provide avel1l!CS for movement of <br />saline water to the surface until deep confining beds <br /> <br />were p.~netrated by the Marland Well. Once charged with <br />snlint> wat~r from deeper aquif~rs, joints and f.1LJlt <br />pl<ln~s ..:Jllo....l=!d r:'1pid lateral and possibly vertical m.we- <br />ment of thi.lt wat~r in And hetween shallow aqui fers (see <br />Figure. 1). <br /> <br />-' <br />-' <br />.. <br />i< <br /> <br />o <br />z <br />,,-' <br />-,-' <br />z" <br />"i< <br />:> <br /> <br />0: <br />.. <br />" <br />0: <br />0: <br />.. .. <br />... " <br />r ~ __ <br />~ ,,----=..-=--:::.:= <br />J..:,~-- <br />~'I <br />1::':1 <br />.6:. , <br />: :-.:~: : <br /> <br />1:'.-:-. <br />I..... <br /> <br />DA KOTA <br /> <br />---=-___CappinQ Layer <br /> <br />,:- <br /> <br /> <br />ENTRADA <br /> <br />MORRISON <br /> <br />CasinQ 553'_ <br /> <br />-._, <br /> <br />DeplhSod .".: <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Dcplh 2002' <br /> <br />WEBER <br /> <br />-------- <br /> <br />fiGURE I <br />WELL rLOW MECHANISM <br />a.1EEKr.R DOLlE. AREA <br />(1981) <br /> <br />The Scott Well annulus (the area between the drill hole <br />and the pipe casing)) poorly cemented above 1.500 feet, <br />was essent ial ly free pipe wi th the potent ial for large <br />volumes of saline water to rise around the pipe and flow <br />into the Morrison Formation. <br /> <br />TIle Marland Well WRS cased only to 553 feet. The casing <br />was disintegrating ami the annulus behind the casing ....as <br />open. After cement was pumped inlo the Marland Inter- <br />cept Well, water le:\'els and flows issuing from the shal- <br />low Morrison aquifer rapidly declined, indicating that a <br />direct connection existed between deep and shallow aqui- <br />fers at the Marland Well. <br /> <br />Flowing water and an ope:n bore hole above 335 feet in <br />the Jame~ Welt and water level response~ in nearby <br />observation wells confirmed that the James Well connect- <br />ed an nrtesian sal ine aquifer in the upper Morrison For- <br />TIIation with the D.:Jkota Sandstone. The James Wdl was <br />the primary SOLJrcc for local salt problems on the east <br />5 ide of the Dome. <br /> <br />Nearly <br />source <br /> <br />idcnt ical water <br />theory for all <br /> <br />quality supports the <br />wat~r encountered. <br /> <br />common- <br />Although <br />