|
<br />FOREST
<br />MANAGE-
<br />MENT
<br />
<br />-
<br />N
<br />w
<br />
<br />About 44,062 acres of suitable About 39,442 acres of suitable
<br />conuneccial forest lands and conuneccial forest lands and
<br />19,262 acres of suitable 24,405 acres of suitable wood.
<br />woodlands would be available lands would be available for
<br />for harvest, reBulting in a harvest, resulting in II possible
<br />possible 8Mual harvest of 1,200 annual harvest of 1,180 MBF 0
<br />MBF of commercial timber, commercial timber, 50 corda
<br />m-cords of fuelwood, 400 of fuelwood; 250 acre. of
<br />wildings. and, on average, 300 reforestation completed 8Mual-
<br />Christmastreel; 50acrelof.ite Iy. Olher forest produclJl (400
<br />preparation and 50 IIcrea of wilding., and, on average, 300
<br />reforestalion would be Christmas trees) would be
<br />completed annually. harvested or would possibly be
<br />available.
<br />
<br />One FMP would be written.
<br />
<br />One FMP would be written.
<br />
<br />Sea!lOnal restrictions apply in
<br />elk. calving areas; harvest in
<br />riparian areas restricted or ex.
<br />cluded on a caac.by-case basis.
<br />
<br />Restrictions apply on crocial elk
<br />and deer winter range
<br />(seasonal) and elk calving areal
<br />(seaaonal and leave areas).
<br />
<br />About 58,959 acrel of suitable
<br />conunercial forest lands and
<br />19,262 acrel of suitable
<br />woodlands would be available
<br />for harvest, resulting in a
<br />possible annual harvest of 1.770
<br />MBF of conunercial timber,
<br />approximately 400 cords of
<br />fuelwood, 400 wildings and, on
<br />average, 300 Christmas trees.
<br />
<br />About 34,679 acrea of suitable
<br />commercial forest lands and
<br />27,352 acres of suitable wood-
<br />lands would be available for
<br />harvest resulting in a possible
<br />annual harvelt of 1,040 MBF of
<br />conunercial timber; 565 cords
<br />of fuelwood, 400 wildings, and,
<br />on average, 300 Christmas
<br />treea. 500 acrea of reforestation
<br />would be accomplished in unit
<br />D-21.
<br />
<br />limber harvests would be
<br />designed to be compatible with
<br />theae alternative objective..
<br />
<br />One FMP would be prepared.
<br />
<br />Same as Alternative E.
<br />
<br />About 41,347 acres of suitable
<br />commercial forest lands and
<br />23,615 acrea of suitable wood.
<br />lands would be IIwilable for
<br />harvell, resulting in a poalible
<br />annual harvest of 1,200 MBF
<br />of commercial umber, 490'
<br />corda of fuelwood, 400 wild-
<br />ing., and, on average, 300
<br />Chri.lma. trecl. Backlog
<br />reforestation would be accom-
<br />plished al funds become avail.
<br />able.
<br />
<br />(: ~,
<br />t. _~
<br />G...~
<br />(,.J
<br />r."
<br />=
<br />
<br />Tunber harvests would be
<br />de.igned to be compatible with
<br />theae alternative objective..
<br />
<br />One FMP would be prepared,
<br />Harvest or deaign restrictions incorporating existing FMPs.
<br />apply in riparian zonel,
<br />Slumgullion slide, areas
<br />exhibiting erodible soils, crocial
<br />big game winter range, within
<br />SRMAJ, on areal where slopes
<br />exceed 35 percent, or for
<br />nongame wildlife habitat and
<br />other recreation re.ources
<br />(harvcst realrictions are
<br />ae&lIOnal or exclusion).
<br />
<br />Harvest restrictions (total
<br />exclusions, design reqUlce-
<br />menta or IC8sonal restrictions)
<br />apply in riparian zonel,
<br />existing WSAJ, Slumgullion
<br />Eartbflow, on areas cxhibiting
<br />erodible soils, crucial big
<br />game winler range, elk calving
<br />areas, within SRMAs, on
<br />areas where .Iope. exceed 35
<br />percent, or for nongame
<br />wildlife habitat and other
<br />recreation resources.
<br />
<br />RECRE-
<br />AnON
<br />MANAGE
<br />MENT
<br />
<br />Continue within limits of
<br />Alternative A, implementation
<br />and management of San Juan
<br />Triangle and Cochetopa Can~n
<br />SRMAJ according to activity
<br />pllna for II. divenity of
<br />opportunitiCl.
<br />
<br />Fully. implement activity plans RAMPs for San Juan Triangle
<br />for San Juan Triangle and Ind Cochetopa SRMAs would
<br />Cochetopa Can)Qn SRMAI be revised to reflect this
<br />according to activity plans, and alternative. Non-conflicting
<br />manage for a divenity of facilitie. would be developed.
<br />opportunities, motorizcd!non- ROS aetting. \WOuld be revised,
<br />motorized. if needed, to reflect revised
<br />RAMPs,
<br />
<br />BLMlUSFS VISitor Deaignate Powderhom SRMA
<br />Lake City would be as an ACEC and manage for
<br />primitive non-molorizcd recre-
<br />atiop opportUnitiel .nd exper-
<br />Powderbom SRMA would be iencel. Restricl use to
<br />managed for non-motorized designated site.. Pul1lUe
<br />primitive recreation experi. acquili.tion and evenlual
<br />ence.. Develop activity plan if withdrawal of state.owned
<br />not designated a. wildcrness, minerals. Drop .primitivc.
<br />
<br />A joint
<br />ccnter in
<br />punued.
<br />
<br />San Juan Triangle SRMA:
<br />Maintain a Yllriety of ROS set-
<br />tings; compatible amall scale
<br />recreation dcvelopments would
<br />be permiucd; floatboe.Ling,
<br />light-seeing, fishing, and IOme
<br />historic .ite m.bilization would
<br />be emphasized.
<br />
<br />Exirrling RAMPa for Cochetopll Cochetopa Can~n SRMA Same a. Alternative E., except
<br />and San Juan Triangle SRMA \WOuld be managed to conlinue Recrcation relourcCl in
<br />would be revised. Actiona in to provide and improve the Cochetopa Can)Qp SRMA would
<br />RAMPs would be implemented exiating divenity of recreation be managed according to
<br />to minimize cODnicta of opportunities empha.iziDg existing activity plan, and no
<br />recreation use and facility fishing and overnight campiDl CRMAP would be prepared. No
<br />development with natural in II. ROII.ded Natural ROS RAMP would be prepared for
<br />valuea. ROS settings to be re- aetting. A CRMAP would be the Gunnison ERMA, and R.oo
<br />detcnnined for SRMAI if prepared. seningl would not be
<br />needed. Patrols are to bc con- determined. ~reation projecl
<br />dueled and signing i. to be in- Alpine Triangle SRMA would plana would be developed in the
<br />ltalled. be managed for a variety of ERMA for aite. proposed for
<br />R.oo aenings and opportuni- cODBlNction. Management uniu
<br />ties, including interpretation, would DOl be prefixed with the
<br />hilloric, lCenic, aOO natural letter E.
<br />values, and biting, aight-
<br />aecing, motorized recre.ation,
<br />
<br />PoWedlom SRMA Unit D-19
<br />(44,767 acres) managed to
<br />enhance natural wlues and
<br />primitive recreation opporlU-
<br />
|