WSP04536 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CHAPTER ONE - COMPARISON TABLE. PRMP AND ALTERNATIVES Table 1-1 (Coot' d) SUMMARIZED COMPARISON OF THE PROPOSED PLAN AND THE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES RE- SOURCE/ RE- SOURCE USE MANAGEMENT UNDER EACH ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE A (Continuation of Currenl Managlmenl) ALTERNATIVE B ALTERNATIVE C ALTERNATIVE D ALTERNATIVE E (Preferred A1lEmati.e) PROPOSED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN . . ... . . . . . . .~ECijvEs:. '~nti~~ ~hB ..: pres"ar:rt.; level.~~.:. .r:!l~th.~;. .". el~d . mi.x "..of.". ~Itip'e :--t'Re" resour~e. ...m~.n~.~em"rit.; ~airitsi.ning existing"". ~8"8.. ... ".outPute/ "and.. protection. . . 8Ctivi~~9. .. . . . ... "......... ... . ...... .. .. . .... ... . . . . . . . .. .... .. . . ... ... . ... :. . . . . . . .. ..... . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . -. . . . . .::~~~mp~b~~~;;;. ::E~~~Og::..:r:= ~~C=:':g'~:~f~:::: ..~~~=i;.t:o:iv~...~~:y~:P::.~~~ .tho~e:. resour~~. Whic.~ . p;~. ~n:ic.: ~~tur,:r .8~.. re80~r'ce". liOn. .. enhancement,. : .. e"nd:. aetiona": tha"i . b~8(.~es~" : ~8. ..th:a:t . b~t .fesOlve8.: the". :;::rtu~~:::.O;ou~::~o:=- . i.;u:r;;ot:~:::l"':to~~t.tto:'.t:f~u=;:Y.i:::ntiO'~co~~~::'"~\ ~:;::ft~:n~~;:;~;o: "riorylic . stabil~tY,.. end :.tM ~8ncirig. the" .!,,8tti~8:t e.~vi;on:-- . ~o~pfttible. level. of. p;Of;iuc- . t:tMP!EIS": t~;actileve .6 :b.ak. acNeW. e: "t;u!llimce . b~~.~n . quality. of life." .... iTu~nt .Bt. 8: ct:!nip8ti~e.. ".nd:. .tiO~-.fo.r.:ren~~~bt8. ~d nD~ ..snce. .between.. competfng: .competh;g demerids .on"-lnM non-restricth;O. !8Ylll:". .ren~w8ble resOurC8S~ .. d.'m8nd8..~n:u.s8B 9f"pubiic:".. ~f .pupiic IlJ~:.: . . lorid,.. .... . . - , - 00 LIVESTOCK GRAZING MANAGEMENT (Conl'd) LivclIl.oCk grazing UK and allocation. to be generally I. per 1987 RPS and updates. Riparian areu conaistcb1ly utilized in heavy range would be examined and IIdjusuncnu made 10 Icu-than-heavy utilization until AMP, are revised or developed. 28 AMP. to be revised; 10-20 new AMP' or CRMAPs 10 be developed. A cooperative noxioul weed control program would be initiated. Existing trutmenll and racilitica maintained; nc..... trutmcnt. and facilitic. dcvcloped if needed to achicvc AMP objectivclI. No Iivc.tock g(8.Zing would continuc on 320 acrel in Livestock: allocaliolUl could be modified further if studic. or data indic.te ChangCII arc necessary. Nc..... or .dditional .v.ilablc forage would be .lloc.ted or ulCd to meet watenbed objec- tives, thcn for wildlife or livestOCk grazing. A cooperativc noxiou8 .....eed control program would be initiated. IGMCI 'Would be implcmented [rangc readine.s on all lands Brazed, minimum ItUbblc height in rip.rian area. (6-,4- and 2- 1 f2 -) maximum total forage utilization rate 40-60'; 00 uplandl] on cnUre planning arca. AMPs or CRMAPa would be developed on -.- allotmenta according to llCbeduJe. in the Fulure forage allocatioDI confliclI. LivellOCk. alloc.tiom generally would be for liveatock. could be modified further if grazing Dl8.mgemenl, then for studies or data indicate ch.nge. ......tenhed resources. are Decesaary. A cooperativc noxious weed control program would be initiated. New or additional available forage 'Would be allocated or used to meet watershed objec- tives. IGMC. \WOuld be implemented (range readinell' on all land. A cooperative noxious weed grazed, and total forage control program 'Would be utilizalion on alllaDd. grazed of initiated. 40-60%) in /he Ploorung AmI, IOMC. (20-40% total forage AMPs or CRMAPs would be utilization levels on upland.. 4- developed or revilCd for -I- minimum stubble height in aUouncntt a. acheduled in 1987 riparian areas, and range readi- RPS and update.. Exilting nell) would bc implemented on categorization to be reviewed aIlaUolmCnll. and cbange. made if necellsary. AMPs would be developed or Existing liveltoCk. trulmentJ revised based on the objective. would be maintained, and new of thi. alternativc and the facilities would be developed scbedule in the 1987 RPS and according to AM Ps and update.. CRMAP., allocations to resolve resource conflictB. Live'loct. allocations could be modified further if studies or data indicate changellarc nece.sary. New or addition.al lMlilable fopge would be allocated or used to meet watenbed objec~ live.. A cooperative noxioulI weed control program 'Would be initialed. Implement a total Corage ulilization level of 40-6011 on all upland.; 4- minimum stubble beighl8 in riparian zone. unill E-14 and E-IS, and aboul 92 mile. of riparian zones in unill &1, E-2, and E-IJ; 2-112" OlUbble beigh.. in all other riparian zonea, and range readine.. would be implemented on aU aUotmenla. moniloring data or other management and reaource data. Categorizalion and rnanagemeol of -M- and -C- aUotmcnll in the 1981 RPS "'QUId cominue uole.. monitoring data aodIor other resource information indicalel adjultmenta are neceaury. On category -I- allolmCnIa, existing management or forage allocation level. would be adjun.cd to achieve or maintain desired plant communitics and to help meel lite foUCM'ing resource need.. I. On ollllllnrk - utilization of te)" forage lpCCie. managed to allow for plant health or maintenance,'MItenhed cover, and quality forage aDd wildlife. coYer. Maximum use on allotments without activity plana/agreements de.igned to achieve above goal. would be 40-60 Ii of ,:u~nr. year'.