My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04531
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04531
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:25:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.111.A
Description
Central Utah Participating Project
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/28/1951
Author
USDOI-BOR
Title
Central Utah Project A Supplement to the Colorado River Storage Project Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />..-' --.,,' <br /> <br />SYNOPSIS <br /> <br />The increased cost of constructing Soldier Creek Dam to the ultimate <br />hbight in the initial phase, which cost would be allocated with other <br />ultimate phase costs, would be repaid from revenues of the ultimate phase, <br />aided as necessary from the Upper Colorado River Account. If the ultimate <br />phase is not construct~d, the increased cost could be repaid from initial <br />phase power revenues in less than 4 years after initial phase costs were <br />repaid or it could be repaid from the Upper Colorado River Account. <br /> <br />One or more conservancy districts formed under the laws of utah <br />could contract for repayment of irrigation and municipal water costs. A <br />conservancy district could assess the W8~er users for direct benefits as <br />outlined in the report and in addition could levy an ad valorem tax on <br />property within the district as a means of raising additional revenue <br />for the project as a return for some of the indirect benefits it creates. <br /> <br />Conclusions <br /> <br />Continued development of the extensive land and mineral resources <br />of the Bonneville and Uinta Basins is dependent on an increased supply <br />of regulated and controlled water for irrigation, municipal, industrial, <br />and other miscellaneous uses, and on an increased supply of electric <br />energy. The Central Utah project would provide the water and part of <br />the power needed in both basins. It affords the only practicable means <br />of providing a substantial "quantity of n~w water for the Bonneville Basin, <br />without which future increases in water use for municipal, industrial, <br />and other miscellaneous purposes in the project area south of Salt Lake <br />City would necessitate corresponding reductions in the present inadequate <br />supply of irrigation water. <br /> <br />The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint. Investiga- <br />tions of the initial phase show it to be economically justified. The <br />ratio of evaluated benefits to costs of the initial phase is estimated <br />at 1.2 to 1.0 exclusive of intangible benefits and unevaluated benefits <br />to !ndian and some other lands in the Uinta Basin which would receive <br />exchange water from the project. <br /> <br />The Jordan River channel improvement and the diking of Goshen Bay <br />of Utah Lake, authorized as features of the Provo River project but not <br />yet undertaken, should be approved as features of the Central utah <br />project. The channe:). improvement should be authorized for construction <br />in the initial phase. <br /> <br />Construction of the Soldier Creek Dam in the initial phase to the <br />full height required for the comprehensive development and the alloc~tion <br />of the increased cost with other ultimate phase costs is justified by the <br />saving in cost that would result frcm one-stage construction. If the <br /> <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.