Laserfiche WebLink
<br />U lJ l I " I <br /> <br />Snowpacks in ~outhern Utah have also <br />been depleted. <br />May I snowpacks in northern Utah <br />are about 15 percent of average and <br />limited to the highest elevations. In <br />southern Utah. snowpacks are 40 to 60 <br />percent of average, again at the higher <br />elevations. <br />Nevada's "best" snowpack is in the <br />Walker River Basin. which reported 27 <br />percent of aver.:Jge on May I. Six of the <br />m.~or has ins in Nevada reported 0 per. <br />cent of average snowpacks. <br />Streamflow. April-July volume fore- <br />casts as of May I range from 20 to 45 <br />percent of the 1961-1990 average in <br />northern Utah and 40 10 I ()() percent in <br />southern Utah. April-July tlow volumes <br />along the east slope of Lhe Sierra are <br />expected to be about 25 percent of aver- <br />age, but in the Humbolut River Basin <br />only 12 percent of average. <br />Many streams throughout Lhe north- <br />ern portion of the Great Basin have <br />peaked during the last two months. The <br />remainder of the streams are expected <br />to peak shortly. <br />April streamflow volumes in Utah <br />varied widely. ranging from 30 to 140 <br />percent of average. TIle highest flows <br />have been in southern portion of the state <br />and in the headwaters of the northern <br />basins because of an early snowmelt. <br />Reservoir storage at the end of April <br />ranged from 40 to 90 percent of capaci- <br />ty i.1CroSS Utah, with a statewide average <br />near 60 percent. Storage at northern <br />Utah reservoirs changed very little from <br />figures reponed last month. Reservoirs <br />in southern Ulah show a decrease of 5 <br />to 10 percent. Reservoir storage in Ne- <br />vada was well below average 011 the last <br />day of April. Statewide, storage is 10 <br />percent of ci\pacity and 14 percent of <br />average. <br /> <br />Columbia Basin <br />Most of the Columbin Basin received <br />above average precipitation in April. <br />but the water supply outlook remains <br />bleak. Only the Upper Columbia in <br />Canada showed slight volume increases. <br />Record low nows are forecast on sever- <br />al sub-basins in southern Idaho, on the <br />lower main-~lem of the Snake and in <br />several Oregon sub~basins. Abnonnally <br />warm temperatures have caused an ex- <br /> <br />tremely early melt. Lute seasun water <br />supply is expected to be severely hmited. <br />Precipitation. April precipitation was <br />above average throughout most of the <br />Columbia Basin. The heaviest precipi- <br />tation fell in western Oregon. where <br />amounts approached 200 percent of <br />~verage. The remaining sub-basins <br />were in the 120 to 150 percem range, <br />with the exception of the middle and <br />upper Snake. upper John Day and the <br />Great Basin in Oregon where precipita- <br />tion ranged from 60 to 100 percent. <br />October-April precipitatiun for the <br />Col umbia Ri ver. above both Grand <br />Coulee and The Dalles was 81 percent. <br />The Snake River at Lower Granlte re- <br />ported 76 percent uf average for the <br />same period. <br />SIIowpack cuntinued to decline in <br />April. with the percentl)f average drop- <br />ping 24 percent. Major contributing <br />factors to the decline were large snow- <br />pack losses in the Upper Columbia sub- <br />basins. The Spokane and Salmon basins <br />both dropped 22 percent in April, while <br />the Kootenai .md Yakim<l basins dropped <br />18 percent. The Pend Oreille Basin <br />dropped II percent and the Snake head- <br />waters dropped 27 percent. nlese ba- <br />sins combine to account for 49 percent <br />of the Columbia Basin water supply. <br />Streamflow forecasts range from near <br />average in the Upper Columbia in Can- <br />ada to less than 10 percent in the south- <br />ern sub-basins. Foreca~lS in the Cascades, <br />Flathead, and Kootenai are 60 10 80 per- <br />cent of average, while southern sub-basin <br />forecasts are 20 to 50 percent. With the <br />warm temperatures., residual flow will <br />be extremely low. falling into the 20 to <br />50 pen'em range. <br />The JanuaJy-July forecast for the <br />Columbia River at Grand Coulee is. 49.7 <br />million acre-feet IMAF). or 79 percent <br />of average, up I percent from April l. <br />llle foreca"it for the Snake River at LQwer <br />Granite for the January-July period is <br />9.8 MAF, or 45 percent of average. The <br />January-July forecast at 'TIle Dalles, <br />lIm.:hanged from last month, is 7\.2 <br />MAF. or 67 percent of average. By <br />comparison. the 1991 runoff was 107 <br />million acre-feeL <br />Reservoir storage on May I continues <br />to be very poor in the southern part of <br />the Columbia Basin. where many reser- <br />voirs are at less than 20 percent of aver- <br />ag.e contents. This lack of slOrage has <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />severely impacted inigation supply in <br />these arcas. On the good side. reser. <br />voirs in Wa~hington. northern Idaho and <br />western Montana have near to slightly <br />below average contents which will pro. <br />vide adequate irrigation waters in these <br />areas. <br /> <br />San Joaquin, <br />Sacramento and <br />North Coastal Basins <br />Water year runoff in 19Y2 is expected to <br />be about 50 percent of average. similar <br />to last year. This is the sixth consecu- <br />tive year of much below average runoff. <br />Precipitation. April precipitation was <br />125 percent of average in the Trinlty <br />and Upper Sacramento river basins, but <br />decreased rapidly to 70 percent of aver- <br />age in the McCloud and Pit river drain- <br />ages into Lake Shasta and also in the <br />Feather and Yuba river basins. The <br />American and Mokelumne liver basins <br />received only 25 percent of the monthly <br />average. Southward along the Sierra. <br />April precipitation was almost non- <br />existent at 7 percem of average in the <br />San Joaquin and Tulare Lake drainage <br />basins. <br />Seasonal precipitatiun since October <br />I is about 85 percent of average state- <br />wide. The central valleys and the cen- <br />tral and southern coastal areas received <br />above average precipitation. Amounts <br />in the major Sierra watersheds were <br />generally 70 percent of the seasonal <br />average. <br />Sllowpack. April temperatures were <br />near record high levels. melting the <br />111cager Sierra mowpack early. Only <br />the highest elevations of the Sierra had <br />snow cover on May I. The May I snow- <br />pack water content was only 25 percent <br />of average cum pared 10 65 percent last <br />year. <br />Reservoir. Total reservoir storage in <br />California on the first of May was 20.2 <br />million acre-feet, or 72 percent of aver. <br />age. This is about 2 million acre-feet <br />more than last year. However, because <br />of the wann spring most of the snow- <br />pi.tck has already melted and mountain <br />stream runoff should recede rapidly. As <br />a result. the current reservoir storage <br />advantage is likely to fade during the <br />nex! two monLhs to levels similar to last <br />year. <br />