Laserfiche WebLink
<br /><:) <br />N <br />....... <br />~ <br /> <br />hydrostratigraphic unit. Spring discharges, artesian well flows, and drill-stem test yields from these <br />units commonly exceed 50 gal/min (Hampton, 1974; Hood, 1976; Sumsion, 1976; Barrett and Pearl, <br />1977; Galloway, 1982; Teller and Welder, 1983). Discharges of several hundred to 3,200 gal/min can <br />occur from the Devonian and Mississippian carbonate rocks unit; discharges of 100 to 60Q gal/min <br />can occur from the Pennsylvanian and Permian sandstone unit. Hydraulic-conductivity values for the' <br />Devonian and Mississippian carbonate rocks unit range from less than 0.001 ft/d in basins to more <br />than 100 ft/d in uplifted areas. Hydraulic-conductivity values for the Pennsylvanian and Permian <br />sandstone unit range from less than 0.0001 ft/d in basins to 20 ft/d in uplifted areas. <br />Hydraulic Conductivity and Transmissivity -- Aquifer-test data for the Devonian and <br />Mississippian carbonate rocks hydrostratigraphic unit in northwestern Colorado were obtainable at <br />only five sites. Additional data were obtained at two sites in Utah and Wyoming within 25 mi of the <br />study area. Aquifer tests analyzed to determine hydraulic conductivity included five drill-stem tests, <br />one pumping test, and the two flowing-well tests at Glenwood Springs that were discussed previ- <br />ously. Sources of data for tests other than those at Glenwood Springs included Petroleum Information <br />Corporation, Colorado Division of Water Resources, and ARea (written commun., 1984-85). <br />Hydraulic conductivity was calculated from the drill-stem test data by the methods of Homer (1951) <br />and Earlougher (1977), and by a method described in Supplement B in the "Supplemental Informa- <br />tion" section at the back of this report. Hydraulic conductivity was calculated from the pumping test <br />data by the method of Lohman (1979, p. 52). <br />Hydraulic-conductivity values calculated from the analyzed test data increase from structural <br />basins to uplifted areas. Hydraulic-conductivity values indicated by drill-stem tests in the Uinta, <br />Piceance, and Sand Wash basins range from 0.00057 to 0.0097 ft/d. In contrast, hydraulic-conductiv- <br />ity values indicated by two drill-stem tests and a pumping test on the flanks of the Sawatch Range, <br />Park Range, and Uinta Mountains range from 0.49 to 0.9- ft/d. Hydraulic conductivity on the in- <br />tensely faulted south-western flank of the White River Plateau at Glenwood Springs is at least 170 ft/ <br />d. The available data, though limited, indicate that hydraulic-conductivity values in the center of <br />uplifted areas are at least three orders of magnitude larger than in the center of adjacent basins. <br />Transmissivity, like hydraulic conductivity, also is larger in uplifted areas than in structural basins (see <br />Fig. 4 in main text, copied from Geldon). <br />Transmissivity values in the study area were obtained directly from aquifer tests only at <br />Glenwood Springs and near Aspen. Elsewhere in the study area, transmissivity was calculated from <br />the product of hydrostratigraphic unit thickness and measured or estimated hydraulic conductivity at <br />grid centers on a lO-mi by lO-mi grid. This analysis indicates that transmissivity in the <br />hydrostratigraphic unit ranges from less than 0.1 to 10 ft**fd in structural basins and from 10 to more <br />than 1,000 sq ft/d in uplifted areas. The transmissivity in the vicinity of Glenwood Springs, as indi- <br />cated by the first and second Redstone well tests, is 47,000 sq ft/d. than 1,000 sq ft/d in uplifted <br />areas. The transmissivity in the vicinity of Glenwood Springs, as indicated by the first and second <br />Redstone well tests, is 47,000 sq ft/d. <br />Hydrodynamics A composite-potentiometric surface map was prepared from all <br />available potentiometric head and spring-altitude data in northwestern Colorado (Fig. 5 in main text, <br />copied from Geldon). This map indicates that water in the Devonian and Mississippian carbonate <br />rocks hydrostratigraphic unit generally flows toward structural basins and river valleys from topo- <br />graphically and structurally high areas on the east and south and in the center of the study area. A <br />major ground-water divide extends between the Uinta Mountains on the west and the Park Range on <br />the east. <br />South and east of Glenwood Springs, water in the Devonian and Mississippian carbonate <br />rocks hydrostratigraphic unit generally flows northwestward, from recharge areas in the Sawatch <br />Range, White River Plateau, and Elk Mountains to the Colorado River. Recharge occurs from pre- <br /> <br />A-S <br />