Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000474 <br /> <br />land acquired by cooperating with State Gnd local governments <br />to provide the necessary control over development. By coordi- <br />nating Federal manage~ent with State and local land use con- <br />trols, not only are costs potentially reduced, but private <br />owners can continue to enjoy the use of their lands. The <br />Forest Service, in commenting on our drdft report, said that <br />placing the burd~n on the county or other local unit of <br />government to implement and enforce zoning regulations to <br />protect rivers is often an impractical solution. <br /> <br />The Senate r0port on the wild and Scenic Rivers Act <br />stated that the intention of the committee was that (1) both <br />Secretaries would encouraae lo~al units of aovernment to <br />adopt zoning ordinances that are consistent with the pur- <br />poses of the act and (2) where such valid ~oning ordinances <br />were in effect and where there was no need for further <br />Federal acquisition, that the appropriate Secretary would <br />suspend acquisition. Fcr example, the report added that <br />for the portion of the St. Croix River that was added to the <br />system in 1968, acquisition would be limited to less than <br />1,000 acres to be used as access points and that the remain- <br />der would be primarily controlled by local zoning ordinances. <br /> <br />The Congressional Record for the Senate bill clarified <br />the Sp.nate committee's intent by notinq that the Secretaries' <br />power of cOlldernnation was to be used to protect scenic and <br />wild rivers from commercial and industrial destructicn, not <br />for indiscriminate acquisition. This bill was not a "land <br />grab," and the condemnation power was primarily for the <br />acquisition of appropriate public access sites. <br /> <br />The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act limits the amount of <br />land and scenic easements that can be acquired and directs <br />the Federal agencies to work with State and local aovern- <br />ments to protect the pri~ate lands through which t~e rivers <br />flow. The Federal agencies have not been working with State <br />and local governments to establish zoning controls as anti- <br />cipated in the act but ha\2 been relying only on the acaui- <br />sition of lands in fee and scenic easements to control - <br />development along the rivers' bank3. <br /> <br />!~ger~!-Ecquisitio~_str~~y <br />.!:~~.!9~ cO':"Ele~L-~~~costly <br /> <br />When the 15 federally administered rivers were admitted <br />to the national system. land acquisition costs were estimated <br />to be $36.8 million. As of June 30, 1977. the agencies <br />estimated that a minimum of $93 million would be needed to <br />acquire c6ntrol over the river corcidor lands, or over 2 1/2 <br />times the original estimate. <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />I: <br />i <br />I <br />[, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />! <br />