Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ <br />C'T';) <br /> <br />CHAPTER VIn <br /> <br />J.LI'EftNilTlVE PLilNS <br /> <br />Enlargement of Existing Ditches from Elk Creek <br /> <br />This ,plan involves enlargement of existing ditches diverting from <br />Elk Creek near New Castle. and pumping the water to Harvey Mesa lands. <br />Water available in Elk Creek would be insufficient for project lands, <br />and an ~xpensive canal diverting from the Colorado River near Gl~nwood <br />Springs would be required to supplement the supply. This plan would bEl <br />excessively costly for the benefits received. <br /> <br />Pumping froffi the Col~rado River <br /> <br />Pumping with hydro pumps powered by water from t,he Colorado River <br />was found impracticable because of the high lift and the long, costly <br />divElrsion canal that would be required. <br /> <br />Canal from Main Elk Creek to Harve.v Gap Reservoir <br /> <br />Under this plan the flow of Main Elk Creek would be tapped at a <br />much lower elevation than in the Elk Falls Canal and Power Conduit plan. <br />Water from the creek would be delivered to the Harvey Gap Reservoir <br />which would be enlarged to a capacity of 6,000 acre-feet, Under the <br />plan the Grass Valley Canal would be abandoned Ilnd additional East Rifle <br />Creek water would not be used. The plan would not fully provide for the <br />project area and its cost per acre served would be materially greater <br />than that for the adop te d plan. <br /> <br />Enlargement of Harvey Gap Reservoir <br /> <br />Harvey Gap Reservoir would be enlarged, and an increase would be <br />rmde in the quantity of East Rifle Creek water it would store during <br />winter and early spring. The cost involved, however, is excessive for <br />the water developed and the development would supply water only to <br />those lands on Harvey Mesa. <br /> <br />Storage on East Rifle Creek <br /> <br />Under this plan water would be stored abov," the Grass Valley Canal <br />intake. Reservoir water could be diverted to all project lands elimi- <br />na ting the ne cessity of storing water for replacElment. The en tire <br />watershed of East Rifle Creek was examined, however, and no feasible <br />reservoir sites were found. <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />54 <br />