Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Lower Virgin River '(Reclamation). This study area is <br />along the Lower Virgin River in northeastern Clark County, <br />Nevada, and northwestern Mohave County, Arizona, and <br />~ includes natural saline ground water averaging 2,400 to <br />(.Jl 3,400 mg/l along the Virgin River between the town of <br />U) Riverside and Lake Mead. <br />n.. <br />~, Early studies of this unit did not offer a cost <br />effective means of salinity control. A proposed 1,000 MW <br />powerplant located in the general area may require a water <br />supply of 14,000 acre-feet per year for cooling purposes. <br />In January 1984, Reclamation reinitiated the study to <br />determine if a dual purpose water supply and salinity <br />control project would be feasible. The powerplant is <br />scheduled for startup in 1996. <br />Moapa Valley (USDA)., The project covers a 5,OOO-acre <br />irrigated area on Muddy River upstream of Lake Mead. The <br />project would include installation of 17 miles of <br />underground piped delivery system, on farm water management, <br />and' salinity control practices. By reducing over <br />irrigation and excessive deep percolation, the average <br />annual salt load is expected to be reduced by 1~,500 tons. <br />SCS published its report on Moapa Valley in February 1981. <br />Other Units Under Consideration. not Currently in Plan <br />Sinbad Valley (BLM and Reclamation). Sinbad Valley is <br />in western Colorado, south of the town of Gateway, Seeps, <br />which contribute to Salt Creek which drains Sinbad Valley <br />have been idfntified as a point sources of saline ground <br />water contributing an ~stimated 5,000 to 8,000 tons per <br />year of salts to the Colorado River system. <br />The BLM initiated a feasibility study of the <br />interception and disposal of these saline waters during <br />fisral year 19H2 and prepared a report on Sinbad Valley in <br />April 19H3, This report idenfified six alternatives and <br />recommended that lead responsibility and funding be assumed <br />b~- Reclamation. <br />Before final selection can be made additional <br />information is needed, The additional information <br />includes; discharge and conductivity measurements to definp <br />salt loads of high flows, onsite evaporation data to <br />further refine the sizing of evaporation ponds for an <br />evaporation alternative, and data on the abandoned wildcat <br />well, No.1, Sinbad Unit, for suitability for deep well <br />injection of the collec~ed brines. In addition to the <br />technical issues, questions relating to water rights and <br />compatibility of the project with existing land uses must <br />be resolved. <br />Mancos Valley (USDA). The report on this 9,200 acre <br />irrigated area along the Mancos River in southwestern <br />Colorado was completed in 1985. The recommended <br />implementation plan includes 3,200 acres of sprinkler <br />systems and other water management/salinity control <br />treatment on about 5,500 total acres. About 17 miles of <br /> <br />-37- <br />