Laserfiche WebLink
<br />W <br />Coil <br />-..J <br />Q) <br /> <br />In 1987, the plan of implementation was reviewed and <br />modified to reflect changes that have occurred since 1984. <br />The plan is described in Chapters IV and V. <br />Temporary Increases <br />The plan of implementation as set forth in this Review <br />is designed to meet the objective of maintaining the <br />salinity concentrations in the lower mainstem at or below <br />those found in 1972 (numeric criteria) while the Basin <br />states continue to develop their compact apportioned <br />waters. The plan of implementation is based on the <br />assumption of a long term mean water supply of 15 maf/yr. <br />However, many natural and manmade factors affect the <br />river's salinity. Consequently, salinity will vary from <br />year to year and may exceed the adopted numeric criteria on <br />qccassions and fall below them on others. In recognition <br />of this, the approved standards permit temporary increases <br />above the cr(teria levels if appropriate salinity control <br />measures are, included in the plan. The salini ty control <br />plan is designed to meet the criteria and to miminize the <br />magnitude and duration of temporary increases. <br />In Figure 2, Chapter 2, the annual average flow <br />weighted salinity concentrations can fluctuate greatly. <br />Recent analyses have shown that impact of natural <br />variations in the hydrologic cycle can have a significant <br />impact on salinity. The above normal runoff of 1983-86 has <br />resulted in a: temporar..y decrease insalini ty concentra ti on <br />of about 300 mg/l TDS at Imperial Dam. By contrast, the <br />plan of implementation, as set forth in this Review, will <br />reduce salinity concentration by approximately 85 mg/l at <br />Imperial by 2010. <br />Efforts to determine the time and magnitude of <br />temporary increases are not practicable because of the <br />uncertainty of accurately projecting the complex and <br />natural variations in river conditions. To date the <br />numeric criteria have not been exceeded nor are they <br />expected to be exceeded in the near future. <br />Uses and Associated Impacts of Salinitv <br />The Colorado River, from its headwaters in the Rocky <br />Mountains to its mouth in the Gulf of California,is <br />utilized for a wide variety of purposes. A portion of the <br />fJow is transported out of the Co.lorado Basin for use in <br />adjacent river basins. In the Colorado River Basin <br />irrigation,municipal and industrial, powerplant cooling, <br />fish ~nd wildlife, and recre~tion are the major uses of <br />river water. <br />Many uses of the waters of the Colorado River are <br />adversely affected by increasing salinity concentrations. <br />Colorado River water users in the lower Basin have suffered <br />significant economic impacts due to. elevated salinity <br />levels. These damages have been estimated to have reached <br />over $100 million per year. If the proposed plan of <br />implementation for salinity Qontrol. as set forth in this <br />review, is not implemented these damages could double early <br />in the twenty-first century. <br /> <br /> <br />-20- <br />