My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04499
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04499
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:44 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:23:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/1964
Author
Norris Hundley
Title
The Colorado Waters Dispute
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"', <br />'Y"'-:'1 <br /> <br />N <br />W <br />c.c <br />'-J( <br /> <br />THE COLORADO WATERS DISPUTE <br /> <br />.~, <br />";" <br /> <br />By Norris Hundley, Jr. <br /> <br />ONCE again the diplomatic relations of the United States and <br />Mexico are troubled by controversy over the waters of the Colorado <br />River, The latest dispute, though building up slowly, is potentially <br />more serious than earlier ones because of the vast agricultural development <br />of the Southwest and the urgency of hemispheric solidarity. Water with <br />heavy salt content draining back into the Colorado from irrigated land in <br />the United States is endangering Mexican crops further downstream. At a <br />time when the Johnson Administration particularly wants the friendship <br />of Mexico and the rest of Latin America, the controversy provides Mexican <br />leftists with a popular rallying point for their attacks on their own govern- <br />ment as well as that of the United States. Unfortunately, the treaty of 19# <br />which divided Colorado River water and guaranteed orderly development <br />of the region was drawn in haste and without clear provision for handling <br />certain obvioUl problems. These omissions are the source of the present <br />quarrel and may become the basis for action by the World Court. <br />Since the turn of the century, Mexico and the United States have been <br />concerned about Colorado River water, and the attitude of each is under- <br />standable. Thi. valuable stream drains some of the most beautiful and driest <br />land in the world-about 242,000 square miles in the United States (parts <br />of Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona and California) <br />and 2,000 square miles in Mexico. From its source high in the snow-capped <br />Rocky Mountains, it flows nearly 1,400 miles in a southwesterly direction <br />through a ma.jestic countryside-painted deserts, Grand Canyon, fertile <br />valleys-where water is as precious as gold. Crossing the international border <br />near Yuma, Arizona, the Colorado winds its last 100 miles through Mexico <br />before emptying into the Gulf of California. <br />Despite its Vast watershed and artery of tributaries, the Colorado is not <br />a heavy flowing stream. In the entire basin the average precipitation is only <br />IS inches and. evaporation quickly reduces runoff by go percent. On the <br />basis of records kept since 192Z, the remaining 10 percent amounts to less <br />than 15,500,000 acre-feet, only a thirty-third of the volume of the Missis.sippi <br />and a twelfth that of the Columbia. <br />But it is obvious to all familiar with the area that, even if the Colorado <br />were fully exploited, thousands of square miles would still remain desert. <br />There is simply not enough water to irrigate all the available land or to pro- <br />vide for more than a handful of cities and industries. This situation has led to <br />bitter disputes between individuals, states and, perhaps most serious of all, <br />between Mexico and the United States. The two nations sparred with one <br />another from the turn of the century until 19#, when they agreed to a treaty <br />which should have settled their differences. <br />When the treaty Was signed, not everyone received the news with joy. <br />Californians, anxious about reclamation projects for which water might not <br />be available, assailed the provision giving Mexico 1,500,000 acre-feet. By <br />January 1945, when the Senate began deliberations on the treaty, proponents <br />of the agreement sought to counter California's charge with a variety of <br /> <br />.:,.' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.