Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001227 <br /> <br />IX.2 <br /> <br />Man's activities are a principal cause of change in the quality of <br />both surface and ground waters. Municipal and industrial sewage dis- <br />charged into streams often contribute extreme concentrations of certain <br />chemical materials that are completely foreign to natural waters. Com- <br />pounds of nitrogen are a common example. Irrigation-return waters carry <br />increased concentrations of salts, which swell the dissolved load in some <br />streams and some ground-water bodies. Even so simple an act of man as <br />providing artificial water storage leads to changes in physical, chemical <br />and biological quality. <br /> <br />Man's methods of measuring water quality have been subject to con- <br />tinuous change and improvement as new techniques and equipment are <br />developed. Both the precision of measurement and the method of sllmpling, <br />however, usually depend upon the purpose to be served. In many cases <br />partial analyses are satisfactory; in other cases, approximate analyses <br />are adequate as indicators. Thus, in interpreting water-quality data both <br />the purpose of, and the conditions surrounding, the original collection of <br />samples and the laboratory determinations "must be considered. An investi- <br />gator of water quality should evaluate what each particular analysis or <br />sample represents in relation to the body of water under study. Further, <br />the choice of field or laboratory procedures must be weighed in relation <br />to the economic value of the study. Some of the constituents dissolved <br />in water may change after a sample is collected; in this situation, fixing <br />or field determination of these constituents must be considered. <br /> <br />Even in the face of all these potential complexities, considerations <br />of cost are such that most investigations of water quality have been and <br />are limited to measurement of a few, pre-selected key components. Thus, <br />a particular deleterious substance may escape detection. For example, <br />in connection with a major construction project, a long series of stand- <br />ardized chemical tests of the stream failed to identify certain organic <br />compounds that were adverse to mixing sound concrete. Commonly, theI'efore, <br />it is highly advisable that any comprehensive water-quality investigation <br />open with a critical reconnaissance including at least one exhaustive <br />analysis. <br /> <br />It should be noted here that I'equirements of biolOgical sampling are <br />quite unlike those of physical and chemical sampling in several respects, <br />For example, because there is no single universal indicator species, <br />analysis of biological samples must depend upon interspecific I'elationships. <br />Thus a rather long series of samples is required. In addition, the analyst <br />must detect and interpret either extreme or widely variable conditions, <br />because water quality must be keyed to critical or threshold levels when <br />aquatic life is concerned. This rules out composite samples, <br /> <br />