Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001219 <br /> <br />VIII.3 <br /> <br />Soil and subsoil may be distinctly stratified, in units that differ <br />substantially in retentive capacity and in permeability. Capillary <br />discontinuity at the interface between two unlike strata commonly impedes <br />downward movement so that, immediately above the interface, the amount of <br />retained water may be substantially greater than "field capacity" (spec:ific <br />. retention) of either of the two strata. In extreme cases, local thin zones <br />may become saturated even though all the soil materials are appreciably <br />permeable. These perched zones of saturation may be transient or lasting. <br />Whether or no a saturated zone exists, a pressure gradient may impart a <br />horizontal component to the movement of soil water. For this reason <br />among many, water may become dispersed non-uniformly through the soil mass. <br /> <br />Temperature gradients cause soil water to move, horizontally or <br />vertically, and lead to non-uniform dispersal. <br /> <br />Over forested and brush-covered terrain, soil water commonly is <br />dispersed non uniformly because precipitation that reaches the land <br />surface is disproportionately large at drip line and stem line of indi- <br />vidual trees and shrubs. For example, stemflow of trees may be as much <br />es 10 percent of gross precipitation; that of shrubs, as much as IS percent. <br /> <br />Whhtever the type of vegetal cover, root channels commonly afford <br />preferred sites for infiltration and lead to non-uniform dispersal of soil <br />water. In somewhat similar fashion, micro-relief of the land surface may <br />concentrate much of the precipitation in scattered minute pools, from which <br />a disproportionately large part of infiltration takes place. <br /> <br />These effects may be exaggerated in the case of "hydrophobic" soils <br />which resist wetting and from which precipitation may be rejected as <br />overland now even though the soil is quite dry. Having been wetted <br />slowly, however, these same soils can accept infiltration readily, both <br />in total amount and uniformly from one point to another. Given such soil, <br />the common assumption that "the wetter the soil the less the infiltration <br />rate" may be invalid, <br /> <br />Investigations of water balance and water yield commonly have taken <br />water-content of the soil as an index of watershed wetness affecting <br />infiltration and runoff, especially flood runoff, It has been found, however, <br />that C0l1lD10nlY the "soil-wetness effect" can be estimated more consistently <br />from records of antecedent precipitation than it can be derived from <br />conventional deternrinations of soil-water content. This despite the fact <br />that soil-water content is the significant variable. <br /> <br />