Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />1060 <br /> <br />1. 33 USCA 8 701-1 (1970) <br /> <br />2. 1 USCA 833 ~~. <br />3. S.D. 191, 78th Cong.; H.D. 475, 78th Congo <br /> <br />4. Page 73 -- Part IV -- Report of Missouri Basin Survey Commission, 1953 <br /> <br />5. H.D. 435, 86th Congress, 2nd Session, page 11 <br /> <br />6. Page 210 -- Part VI -- Report of Missouri Basin Survey Commission, 1953 <br /> <br />7. 43 USCA 8 390b (1964) <br />8. 43 USCA ~ 390b(d) (1964) <br /> <br />9. Page 107 -- Part V -- Report of Missouri Basin Survey Commission, 1953 <br /> <br />10. See for example Reclamation Project Act of 1939, 53 Stat. 1187 <br /> <br />11. Page 231 -- Part VII -- Report of Missouri Basin Survey Commission, 1953 <br /> <br />12. H.D. 435, 86th Cong.; 2nd Session, page 74 <br /> <br />13. IBID, page 78 <br /> <br />14. Memasket Mills V. City of Tauton, 166 Mass. 540, 44 N.E. 609 (1896) <br /> <br />15. People ex reI. Peeler V. Chicago & E.I.R.Co., 262 Ill. 492, 104 N.E. B3l (1914) <br /> <br />16. Adirondack Power and Light Corp. v. City of Little Falls, l4B Misc. 191, <br />265 N.Y.S. 567 (1930). The court interpreted "normal flow" to mean the <br />flow that is not affected by "storm water" and "natural flow" as the <br />flow not affected by artificial conditions. <br /> <br />17. H.D. 435, B6th Congress, 2d Session <br />