Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1055 <br /> <br />responsibility for the six main stem reservoirs. The legislative acts speak <br />to this item very plainly. The statutes only assigned fiscal responsibility to <br />the Department of the Interior for irrigation repayment. Interior also claims <br />control of power revenues from all Missouri Basin projects. There seems to be <br />some difference of opinion as to whether this broad action of Interior is by <br />authority or default by other agencies.~/ It is recognized that this particular <br />matter is academic since the Interior has become the collector of revenue for <br />power and irrigation. However, the assertion that revenues from M&l use should <br />also revert to the basin account is without statutory foundation. There appears <br />to be a serious question as to the authority of the Interior to market anything <br />other than power and irrigation water from a Corps of Engineers' structure. <br />A cursory examination of the Reclamation lawslOI would seem to have extended <br />authority to the Interior for marketing waters from those projects over which <br />Interior would have sole jurisdiction. However, except for irrigation and power <br />functions, this authority does not appear to have been extended to projects <br />under jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. In a presentation to a MBIAC <br />meeting in 1950, General Sturgis, then Division Engineer, and subsequently <br />Chief of Engineers, commented on this subject as follows: <br /> <br />General Sturgis said he thought the Corps of Engineers and the <br />Bureau of Reclamation working with the states could handle the <br />matter. He indicated they had reached the following agreement: <br /> <br />a. The flood control and irrigation functions of multiple-use reservoirs <br />constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps of Engineers can <br />be carried out most effectively by close coordination of the direction <br />of operations for such purposes by the regular offices of the two <br />agencies. <br /> <br />b. The Corps of Engineers will be primarily responsible for <br />determination of the flood control operation of reservoirs con- <br />structed by both agencies. <br /> <br />c. The Bureau of Reclamation will be primarily responsible for <br />determination of the irrigation operation of reservoirs constructed by <br />both agencies. <br /> <br />d. Whichever agency constructs and maintains the reservoir will <br />be primarily responsible for its functional operation for purposes <br />other than irrigation and flood control, including such arrangements <br />with the states and other agencies as may be required.lll <br /> <br />The question of disposition of revenues from water supply sales is discussed in <br />Borne detail by the Bureau of Reclamation in its report on the Garrison Diversion <br />Unit. This report states, <br /> <br />No project works are proposed specifically for the municipal and <br />industrial water users. It is necessary, however, that the sale <br />of water for these purposes recover sufficient income to meet the <br />annual allocation of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs <br />and to repay, with interest at 2~ percent over a 50-year period, <br />an allocated share of joint construction costs, plus interest <br />during construction.lll <br /> <br />4. <br />