Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />A three-year field inventory of front-range and eastern plains fishes in streams in the South <br />Platte River basin has been completed. Over 800 sites were visited in 15 hydrographic units (stream <br />drainages) and 47 percent of the sites contained fish. The sample of more than 62,000 fish <br />demonstrated native species comprised over 95 percent. Twenty-five of27 native species expected <br />to occur in these South Platte streams were found, and 60 percent of these species were found to be <br />abundant .or common. Of the native species, 6 were judged to be abundant, 9 common, and 10 <br />uncommon. Of 16 introduced fish species found, only one was considered common, the remainder <br />were uncommon and reproductive success by introduced fish was insignificant overall. Five to six <br />of the uncommon fish species are being considered as the focus of intensive conservation management <br />actions, which may include state listing as threatened or endangered. Native species diversity on a <br />per site basis has declined since 1980, though on a larger watershed or sub-basin scale, native fish <br />species diversity and the distribution of native fish communities appears better than expected. At <br />present, introduced fish species is not considered a limiting factor in the welfare of these South Platte <br />native fishes. Large scale habitat modification within the flow regime, water quality, and river channel <br />morphology have occurred from historic times, and are more likely contributing factors to the <br />declines observed in distribution and abundance of some of the native fishes. <br /> <br />F our species assemblages were identified from cluster analyses and categorized by <br />macrohabitat types. The presence/absence of native fishes was compared to 22 habitat parameters <br />using stepwise regression analyses, Microhabitat selection was evident among species occupying the <br />macrohabitat type. The number of native fish species per hydrographic unit ranged from 3-18 and <br />10 hydrographic units contained 10 or more native fish species. The frequency of occurrence of <br />native fish communities across hydrounits indicated none of the four categories described here appear <br />rare or at risk. The uncommon native fishes represent the missing components in most of the fish <br />communities in each hydrographic unit. The greatest numbers of nonnative fish species were <br />associated with hydrographic units supporting high numbers of native fish species. <br /> <br />Management and research recommendations include: <br /> <br />1. intensive conservation emphasis directed toward those native fish species observed to be in <br />decline and extremely rare in abundance or limited in distribution. These efforts would <br />include further inventory to better document occurrence, distribution and abundance of <br />populations of six species in or adjacent to known occurrence sites. <br /> <br />2. translocation of individuals to establish new populations in unoccupied stream habitat or pond <br />refugia. <br /> <br />3. enhance regulatory protection via extended restrictions in potential take or harvest, and <br />consideration of listing as threatened or endangered via the Commission process. <br /> <br />4. continue monitoring of 3 fish species of special concern vulnerable to decline. <br /> <br />ix <br />