|
<br />
<br />Plains topminnow and fathead minnow followed with 5 to 6 percent oftotal collections, and
<br />johnny darter, largemouth bass, common shiner, commO\l carp, and brook stickleback each added
<br />more than I percent. Iowa darter, longnose sucker, broWn trout, yellow perch, and stonecat were
<br />each found in several locations. Over 20 specimens of e~ch of these species were captured
<br />(approx. 0.5-1% of the total). The rest of the species represented in collections (in decreasing
<br />order of abundance) were red shiner, green sunfish, plains killifish, mosquitofish, bluegill, brassy
<br />minnow, white crappie, smallmouth bass, and channel catfish.
<br />
<br />Introduced species collectively made up less than 0.5 percent of the total collection. Half
<br />of the introduced species found were largemouth bass, but 108 out of 109 fish found in our
<br />samples were likely young-of-the-year immigrants fromladjacent gravel pits. One fish was about
<br />six inches long, and may have survived in the river for ~ year. However, no evidence was found
<br />that largemouth bass survive in the river to the extent of creating a predation threat.
<br />
<br />Propst (1982) reported significant changes in species abundance, presence, nomenclature,
<br />and difficulty in documenting reliability ofinformation !lbout species status at the turn of the
<br />century from the accounts ofJordan (1891), Juday (1995), and Ellis (1914). However, the status
<br />of St. Vrain fishes from the 1950s and 1960s (reports by Hendricks (1950), Beckman (1952) and
<br />Li (1968)) was relatively unchanged when Propst samrlled in the late 1970s after Colorado's Front
<br />,
<br />Range (including the St. Vrain drainage) had become ~\.xbject to human population pressures,
<br />industrialization and intensive water manipulation. '
<br />
<br />The most obvious management strategy for the mainstem St. Vrain involves protecting
<br />and enhancing the valuable resource, which is already present. In 1994, the CDOW and the city
<br />of Longmont joined in a project to help create more deep plunge-pool instream habitat, and to
<br />place rock and boulder structure to create overhead cave-like cover in the plunge-pool
<br />approaches and tail ends of the pools. These efforts specifically targeted enhancements of habitat
<br />for common shiner and stonecat. This project also cr~ated off-channel isolated pools which will
<br />articulate with the river at high flows. Future efforts ~hould involve water quality analysis to
<br />determine potential limiting factors between the upstream reach of the river above the confluence
<br />of Left hand, Boulder and Dry creeks, the downstream reach of the St. Vrain River, and the
<br />tributary creeks as well.
<br />
<br />;
<br />Fifty-two sites were sampled on St. Vrain drainage tributaries (Table 19). These were all
<br />located in the foothills transition zone or plains dra;n~ge areas. Sampling efficiency was generally
<br />good throughout the drainage. Several targeted site~ in the agricultural area near Frederick and
<br />Firestone were never sampled because the streams,w'ere high and turbid throughout the sampling
<br />season. Agricultural irrigation runoff was frequently encountered, but most sites were sampled on
<br />streams under low, clear water conditions.
<br />
<br />The fish populations found in these tributari~s varied significantly over those found in the
<br />mainstem St. Vrain. Fathead minnow, longnose dac,e, creek chub, white sucker, and green sunfish
<br />comprised 86 percent of the total, with uncommon 9r environmentally-sensitive species, which
<br />were abundant in the mainstem, making up only 2 percent (Table 20), Largemouth bass, brown
<br />
<br />32
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />
|