Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Plains topminnow and fathead minnow followed with 5 to 6 percent oftotal collections, and <br />johnny darter, largemouth bass, common shiner, commO\l carp, and brook stickleback each added <br />more than I percent. Iowa darter, longnose sucker, broWn trout, yellow perch, and stonecat were <br />each found in several locations. Over 20 specimens of e~ch of these species were captured <br />(approx. 0.5-1% of the total). The rest of the species represented in collections (in decreasing <br />order of abundance) were red shiner, green sunfish, plains killifish, mosquitofish, bluegill, brassy <br />minnow, white crappie, smallmouth bass, and channel catfish. <br /> <br />Introduced species collectively made up less than 0.5 percent of the total collection. Half <br />of the introduced species found were largemouth bass, but 108 out of 109 fish found in our <br />samples were likely young-of-the-year immigrants fromladjacent gravel pits. One fish was about <br />six inches long, and may have survived in the river for ~ year. However, no evidence was found <br />that largemouth bass survive in the river to the extent of creating a predation threat. <br /> <br />Propst (1982) reported significant changes in species abundance, presence, nomenclature, <br />and difficulty in documenting reliability ofinformation !lbout species status at the turn of the <br />century from the accounts ofJordan (1891), Juday (1995), and Ellis (1914). However, the status <br />of St. Vrain fishes from the 1950s and 1960s (reports by Hendricks (1950), Beckman (1952) and <br />Li (1968)) was relatively unchanged when Propst samrlled in the late 1970s after Colorado's Front <br />, <br />Range (including the St. Vrain drainage) had become ~\.xbject to human population pressures, <br />industrialization and intensive water manipulation. ' <br /> <br />The most obvious management strategy for the mainstem St. Vrain involves protecting <br />and enhancing the valuable resource, which is already present. In 1994, the CDOW and the city <br />of Longmont joined in a project to help create more deep plunge-pool instream habitat, and to <br />place rock and boulder structure to create overhead cave-like cover in the plunge-pool <br />approaches and tail ends of the pools. These efforts specifically targeted enhancements of habitat <br />for common shiner and stonecat. This project also cr~ated off-channel isolated pools which will <br />articulate with the river at high flows. Future efforts ~hould involve water quality analysis to <br />determine potential limiting factors between the upstream reach of the river above the confluence <br />of Left hand, Boulder and Dry creeks, the downstream reach of the St. Vrain River, and the <br />tributary creeks as well. <br /> <br />; <br />Fifty-two sites were sampled on St. Vrain drainage tributaries (Table 19). These were all <br />located in the foothills transition zone or plains dra;n~ge areas. Sampling efficiency was generally <br />good throughout the drainage. Several targeted site~ in the agricultural area near Frederick and <br />Firestone were never sampled because the streams,w'ere high and turbid throughout the sampling <br />season. Agricultural irrigation runoff was frequently encountered, but most sites were sampled on <br />streams under low, clear water conditions. <br /> <br />The fish populations found in these tributari~s varied significantly over those found in the <br />mainstem St. Vrain. Fathead minnow, longnose dac,e, creek chub, white sucker, and green sunfish <br />comprised 86 percent of the total, with uncommon 9r environmentally-sensitive species, which <br />were abundant in the mainstem, making up only 2 percent (Table 20), Largemouth bass, brown <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />