Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />There was no statistical reason to assume one method was superior to another. The choice of a <br />particular cluster analysis technique over another was purely a subjective decision based on the <br />biological knowledge of each species and whether the groupings made sense from a biological and <br />management standpoint. We further assumed that this methodology would be used as a starting <br />point only and that we would revise the groupings based on new species-habitat information. <br /> <br />A number of physical habitat parameters (Table I) were then regressed against species <br />occurrence to determine which appeared to influence presence the most. The procedure used was <br />forward selection step-wise logistic regression at the 0.15 significance level. Only species which <br />were found at 30 or more sites were considered in the logistic regression analyses. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />d h . I h . <br /> <br />d <br /> <br />h <br /> <br />Table I. Water aua It v an I phvslca abltat parameters measure at eac sample sIte. <br />Chloride Backwater % <br />pH Riparian-tree cover % <br />Sulfate Riparian-grass % <br />Hardness Riparian-shrub % <br />Dissolved oxygen Silt % <br />Ammonia Sand % <br />PHTH alkalinity Gravel % <br />Total alkalinity Cobble % <br />Temperature Boulder % <br />Width (average) Total streambed veg. cover % <br />Depth (average) Total veg.- % algae <br />Velocity (ft/sec) Total veg.- % rooted material <br />Riffle % Riffle/pool ratio <br />Run % Undercut banks % <br />Pool % Gradient <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />There are 18 hydrographic units (hydrounits) contained wholly or partially within the <br />South Platte River Basin in Colorado (Figure I). Fish sampling results are reported for each <br /> <br />7 <br />