Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Objectives of the project were: <br /> <br />1) To compile the available historic database on presence, distribution and abundance of <br />native fish species in the South Platte River Basin into computerized database files; <br /> <br />2) To conduct inventory throughout the South Platte mainstem and tributaries to assess <br />status and population trends of native fish species; and <br /> <br />3) To determine management strategies for individual species, guilds, or critical habitat types. <br /> <br />Complementary to this emphasis on the status of the native fishes, the CDOW developed <br />and approved a Long Range Plan for the agency (CD OW 1994), which emphasizes the <br />determination of status of all Colorado's wildlife species (Goal 4), and proactive conservation of <br />wildlife species that may be at risk of becoming threatened or endangered (Goal 5). This report <br />serves as the culmination of the 3-year inventory project and contributes to the achievement of <br />these Long Range Plan goals. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Study area <br />The South Platte River Basin includes almost 60,000 km2 in drainage area, and covers <br />much of the north-central and northeastern portions of Colorado (Figure 1). Sampling was <br />targeted at the mainstem river and tributary streams within the transition! Front Range (<1,980 <br />km in elevation) and eastern plains zones of the basin. The study area included 18 U.S.G.S. <br />hydrographic units representing smaller tributary drainages within the basin. The transition and <br />plains streams were targeted for fish collections to allow comparisons with historic data collected <br />in 1978-1980 by Propst (1982), which represents the' most comprehensive past record offish <br />distribution and abundance data in terms of geograpHic scope. <br /> <br />Field sample site selection <br />Sampling was conducted only in natural stream courses, though there is potentially <br />additional habitat for native species in manmade irrigation canals, stock ponds, gravel pits, natural <br />lakes, and reservoirs. Initially, a series of sampling sites was located at 3 to 5 km intervals from <br />the downstream terminus of each stream (Figure 2).! Site placement and frequency were <br />somewhat dependent upon access. Where possible, .historic collection sites were included in this <br />sampling effort. Each perennial tributary branching from the larger stream was sampled as a <br />separate, smaller drainage basin. The main channel of each stream or river was sampled at least <br />once between confluences of major tributaries. A well-developed county road system enabled <br />most streams to be sampled at roughly 1.6 km intervals. The largest rivers (South Platte, Cache <br />la Poudre, St. Vrain and Big Thompson rivers), were sampled less frequently, but samples were <br />taken at least every 8 km. Sampling in the greater Denver metropolitan area and surrounding <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />