My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04460
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:22:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.980
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations - Upper Gunnison/Uncompahgre Basin Water Study
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
11/1/1988
Title
Phase I Feasibility Study for Upper Gunison-Uncompahgre Basin -- Task Memorandum No. 6
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~";"1 <br /> <br />Ohio Creek is a poor fishery at present, however, the proposed storage <br />site is on the Castle Creek tributary which is a good brook trout fishery <br />at present. The reservoi rs proposed for the Tomi ch i and Ohi 0 Creek <br />sub-basins should develop into good fisheries and the proposed streamflow <br />enhancement downstream of these reservoirs should result in an improved <br />stream fishery below the dams. The Cochetopa basin facility on the other <br />hand is projected to experience fluctuations of a magnitude that may not <br />produce a good fishery nor does it have sufficient hydrologic yield to <br />meet target streamflow enhancement but does improve historical streamflow <br />signlficantly. <br /> <br />~ <br />.J <br />Co\} <br />"" <br /> <br />Altel'native No. 3 is a combination of Alternatives 1 and 2 and will <br />exhibit the positive and negative impacts of both alternatives. <br /> <br />Altel'native No. 4 combines a portion of <br />in-basin reservoirs of Alternative No.2. <br />alternative would be very similar to <br />recreation benefits would be reduced. <br /> <br />A lternat i ve 1 with the three <br />Environmental impacts of this <br />those of Alternative 3 and <br /> <br />Alternative No. 5 is similar to 4 except the Upper Cochetopa reservoir <br />has not been included. The Upper Cochetopa reservoir has a relatively <br />high' potential impact on stream fisheries and relatively low recreation <br />potential. Therefore, this plan should have similar benefits and fewer <br />environmental problems than Alternative 4. <br /> <br />Alternative 6 is similar to 4 except only one in-basin reservoir located <br />in the Upper Tomichi area would be constructed. Fishery and recreation <br />benefits associated with the Ohio Creek facility would be foregone. Of <br />most significance would be the loss of the opportunity to improve Ohio <br />Creek streamflows. <br /> <br />Two potential financing mechanisms were identified that may be able to <br />provide revenue to assist with repayment of the in-basin development plans. <br />These are the Needle Point No. 3 pumped-storage project and the Taylor Park <br /> <br />$-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.