My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04447
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04447
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:31 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:21:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.D
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1999
Author
Schmidt/John C.
Title
Summary & Synthesis of Geomorphic Studies Conducted During the 1996 Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Summary and Synthesis of Geomorphic Studies Conducted During the 1996 <br />Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon <br /> <br />John C. Schmidt <br /> <br />Department a/Geography aJld Earlh Rtsourr:t.s, Utah Srat~ University. Logan <br /> <br />The 1996 controlled flood demonstrated that a discharge of 1274 m3/s was <br />sufficient to form or rework alluvial deposits along the Colorado River in Grand <br />Canyon. This flood was moderately large in relation to other floods that have <br />occurred since Glen Canyon Dam was completed in 1963. The flood also <br />provided the opponunity to make measurements of physical processes that <br />occurred. The flood caused widespread deposition of sand to elevations 3-5 m <br />above the stage of the administratiyely-determined minimum daytime dam <br />release of 227 m3/s and caused an increase in the area and volume of the high- <br />elevation pans of sand bars, thereby increasing the number of new campsites. <br />The low-elevation pans of the same eddies were eroded, as were adjacent <br />channel pools. Recently-aggraded debris fans were reworked. Suspended- <br />sediment transpon measurements showed that suspended-sand concentrations <br />decreased with time and that transpon rates are highest when the channel bed is <br />retatively fine and has a higher proponion of sand. The controlled flood was most <br />effective during the first 4 days when mainstem transpon rates and eddy <br />deposition rates were high; debris-fan reworking entirely occurred during the first <br />4 hrs at one site. Modeling studies strongly indicate that resultant eddy-bar topog- <br />raphy depends greatly on the concentration of mainstem suspended sediment and <br />the initial topography of eddies. Large-scale erosion occurred on different days at <br />different sites and had the potential to evacuate large proponions of newly- <br />deposited sand from eddies. The final flood-formed topography of eddy bars was <br />thus highly variable from site to site and from reach to reach. <br /> <br />I. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />riyer was sufficiently different immediately after the flood <br />that many r;yer users and managers termed the flood a <br />resource-management "success"[Collier et al.. 19971. The <br />flood also proyided the opportunity to measure physical <br />processes that cause sediment entrainment, transport, and <br />deposition during flood in a river where channel conslric- <br />tions and lateral zones of flow separation are common. <br />These geomorphic measurements led research scie",isls 10 <br />revise some fundamental ideas about geomorphic processes <br />in Grand Canyon and other rivers where fan-eddy <br />complexes, as described by Schmidt and Rubin [19951. are <br /> <br />The 1996 controlled flood was an opportunity 10 demon- <br />strale the role or floods in forming and reworking alluvial <br />deposits along the Colorado River in Glen, Marble, and <br />Grand canyons. The slatus of physical resources along the <br /> <br />The Controlled Flood in Grand Canyon <br />Geophysical Monograph 110 <br />Copyright 1999 by the American Geophysical Union <br /> <br />329 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.