<br />post-war years, with accompanying industrial develop-
<br />ment, tended to enhance the urban population.
<br />The rural farm population decreased 40 percent
<br />between 1940 and 1960, while the rural nonfarm
<br />population increased 20 percent for the same period.
<br />The urban population, comprising people living in
<br />cities with a population of 2,500 or more, was about 4.6
<br />million in 1960. A summary of urban places by number
<br />and size follows:
<br />
<br />Item
<br />
<br />Urban Places in J 960
<br />No. Percent of Population
<br />
<br />Total urban places
<br />SMSA'sl
<br />Other urban places by
<br />number of people:
<br />25,000-50,000
<br />10,000-25,000
<br />5,000-10,000
<br />2,500- 5,000
<br />
<br />207 100.0
<br />I I 64.8
<br />
<br />] I 8.1
<br />34 1 1.0
<br />51 8.2
<br />100 7.9
<br />
<br />1 A standard metropolitan statistical area (SMSA) comprises
<br />a county or group of counties containing at least one cit.y of
<br />50,000 inhabitants or contiguous cities with a combined
<br />population of 50,000 or more. At least 75 percent of the
<br />labor force in a county must be nonagricultural, and the
<br />county must have a density of 150 persons per square miie.
<br />
<br />Plate I shows metropolitan areas and urban places of
<br />the basin. On plate 2, population projections for the
<br />basin (and subbasins) indicate a steady basin growth to
<br />about 2~ times the 1960 population by 2020.
<br />Prior to 1900, the basin served as a safety valve by
<br />providing the eastern population a place to move if
<br />congestion became excessive. The vast majority of
<br />people who left the basin's farms have migrated to the
<br />cities, both within and outside of the basin. Even though
<br />untrained for off-farm employment, most of these
<br />migrants have been provided with a better standard of
<br />living and greater livelihood opportunities. This has been
<br />especially true for the young, who are just beginning
<br />their productive lives_ Some of the Missouri Basin States
<br />have experienced out-migration of the most productive
<br />age group (20-34). During the period of 1950-60, South
<br />Dakota, for example, lost some 94,000 persons of whom
<br />38 percent were of this most-productive age group.
<br />These are the people in which the states have made great
<br />capital investments in education and training. This
<br />constitutes a loss of the human resource; for South
<br />Dakota it represented 23 percent of the population in
<br />the 20-34 year age group. Out-migra.tion for the total
<br />state population amounted to ahout 14 percent. This is
<br />the part of.the region's population that is best able to
<br />pay taxes and is most willing to make the capital
<br />improvements to stimulate permanent growth.
<br />Agriculture has experienced a revolution or at least
<br />some drastic changes in the last decade. Modern tech-
<br />
<br />.\6
<br />
<br />nology has made agricultural land and labor vastly more
<br />productive. The vast production capacity of the agricul-
<br />tural industry has created economic conditions which
<br />make efficient use of land. labor, and capital. Ever
<br />increasing sizes of farms. either through physical ex-
<br />pansion or intensification, have resulted. Both contri-
<br />bute to further problems. Intensification increases the
<br />total output of the industry and adds further to
<br />economic woes. Expansion in size eliminates employ-
<br />...ment and intensifies the migration to industries in urban
<br />areas, usually in other regions since this region is
<br />essentially agriculturally oriented. The number of farms
<br />in the Missouri Basin decreased by nearly 150.000
<br />between 1949 and 1964, or nearly 30 percent of the
<br />] 949 level. Since 1954, about one out of every five farm
<br />operators has changed occupation or retired without
<br />being replaced. This out-migration results in reper-
<br />cussions both in the area of departure and the new area
<br />of arrival. The out-migration seriously affects the social
<br />and economic base of the community, county, and state.
<br />The churches, school districts, and the many community
<br />businesses and services find it difficult to continue their
<br />operations in the presence of a shrinking economic base.
<br />Concomitant with the out-migration of rural popula-
<br />tion has been a rather dramatic increase in urban
<br />populations; however, the urban growth has been very
<br />selective. Urban centers whose business has remained
<br />that of serving agriculture have not grown. Most small
<br />towns and hamlets have actually lost population_ The
<br />exceptions are the county seats or towns which have
<br />been able to retain other governmental functions,
<br />develop tourist services, or become "bedroom
<br />communities" for larger urban neighbors.
<br />With the decline of the small towns, larger cities have
<br />tended to take over their service functions. Conse-
<br />quently, travel distances have become greater as the rural
<br />population turns to the "distant" city to satisfy most of
<br />the rural needs.
<br />The large metropolitan areas have experienced the
<br />highest percent of growth since the ] 930's. These
<br />centers have continued to function as the gateways to
<br />commerce within the basin. In addition, their bases have
<br />become diversified with manufacturing, food processing,
<br />professional services, and governmental functions being
<br />important segments of their economies.
<br />One of the very striking characteristics of the basin is
<br />the absence of large urban centers on the plains. By far
<br />the largest concentration of population is along the
<br />eastern edge of the basin, with a secondary concentra-
<br />tion along the foot of the mountains in the west.
<br />Between these two there are virtually no urban places of
<br />material significance.
<br />Metal refining, oil, governmental institutions. educa-
<br />tion facilities, and tourism have provided most of the
<br />economic growth for the few larger towns and cities in
<br />the plains. Only a few cities in the vicinity of large
<br />
|