Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Federal Regi&-~ / Vol, 58. No, 18 / Friday. January 2~~93 I Proposed Rules <br /> <br />6583 <br /> <br />Pursuant to section 4(b)(2) of the Act, <br />critical habitat is to be designeted on the <br />basis of the best scientific data available. <br />and after considering. the economic and <br />other impacts of designation, Areas may <br />be excluded from the designation if the <br />Secretarv detetmin.. that the benefits of <br />exclusion outweigh the benefits of <br />critical habitat d..ignation, unless the <br />exclusion will result in the species' <br />extinction. <br /> <br />This designation of critical habitat for <br />the Colorado River endangered fish <br />consisted of three major steps, The first <br />step was to complete a biologically-, <br />based determination of potential critical <br />habitat areas. The second step will <br />detennine the impacts of this <br />designation. Tha third step will ba to <br />decida which areas, if any. should be <br />excluded based upon economic or other <br />relevant impacts and to detennine the <br />costs and benefits associated with the <br />final designation, <br /> <br />The first step required an inventory of <br />areas needed for the survival and <br />recovery of the four species, For the <br />razorback sudeer. the biological <br />delennination was based on the primary <br />constituent elements. additional <br />selection criteria determined by the <br />Service, 'past Service findings. and other <br />published and non published sources, <br />These constituent elements and <br />selection criteria were then applied <br />throughout the historical range of the <br />razorback sudear, For tha Colorado <br />squawfish. humpbade chub. and <br />bonytail chub, the biological <br />datennination was based on the primary <br />constituent elements. recovery plans for <br />these speci... past Service findings. and <br />other published and nonpublished <br />sources, The biological support <br />document will provide the details of the <br />biological detanninations, <br /> <br />The second step will be to detennine <br />the potential Impacts of the proposed <br />designaticns. These impacts will be <br />addressed in the economic analysis, <br /> <br />The third step will be to decide which <br />areas, if anv. should ba excluded based <br />upon a detOrmination that tha benefits <br />of the axclusion outweigh the benefits of <br />designation unless the axclusion will <br />result in the extinction of eny of the four <br />species, Any changes in critical hahitat <br />areas resultins from the exclusion <br />process will be noted in,the final rule, <br /> <br />Additional Selection Criteria for the <br />Rozorbock Sucker <br /> <br />Bacause a recovery plan for the <br />razorback sucker has not yet been <br />prepared, additional selection criteria <br />were developed to assist the Service in <br />malting e determination of which areas <br />to propose as critical hebitat. Previous <br />Service findings. other publishad and <br />unpublished literature sources. and <br />discussions with individual membera of <br />the Colorado River Fishe. Recovery <br />Teem were utilized to deveiop the <br />constituent elements and additionel <br />selection criteria. <br />The razorbade sudeer hes displayad a <br />degrae ofversatility in its ability to <br />survive and spawn in different habitats. <br />However. razorback sucker populations <br />continue to decline and are considered <br />below the survivellevel. Thus. a. <br />versatile as the razorback sucker appears <br />to be in selecting spawning habitat. <br />there has been little or no recruitment <br />of yaung to the adult population. <br />Therefore. special consideration was <br />given to habitats required for its <br />reproduction and recruitment. <br />The following selection criteria were <br />used by tha ServiCllto help detennine <br />areas necessary for survival and <br />recovery of the ruorback sudear, <br />1, Known or suspected wild spawning <br />populations. although recruitment may <br />be limiting or nonexistent. <br />2, Areas where juvenile razorback <br />suckers have been collected or whicn <br />could provide suitable nursery habitat <br />(backwaters. flooded hottomlands. or <br />coves). <br />3, Areas presently occupied or that <br />were historically occupied that are <br />considered neCllssary for recovery and <br />that have the potential for establishment <br />of razorback sucker, <br />4, Areas and water required to <br />maintain rangewide fish distribution, <br />and divarsity under a variety of <br />physical. chemical, and biological <br />conditions. <br />5, Areas that need special <br />management or protection to insure <br />razorback survival and recovery. These <br />areas once met the habitat needs of the <br />razorback sudeer and may be <br />recoverable with additional protection <br />and management.. <br /> <br />Summary <br />The primary constituent alements <br />were applied throughout the historical <br />range of the Colorado River endangered <br /> <br />fishes,ln addition. the five selection <br />criteria described above were also used <br />to evaluate potential razorback sudeer <br />critical habitat areaa. The proposed <br />critical habitat designations are based <br />on the primary constituent elements. <br />published and unpublished sources, <br />Service reports and other findings,. <br />recovery plans (for Colorado squawfish, <br />bumpback chub. and bonytail chub). <br />additional selection criteria. and the <br />preliminary recovery goal. being <br />presenlly discussed far the razorback <br />sucker by the Colorado River Fishes <br />Recovery Team. <br /> <br />Proposed Critical Habitat Designation <br /> <br />The resuits of the critical habitat <br />inventory process described above are <br />presented'in this section. The presence <br />of one or more primary constituent <br />elements did not automatically result in <br />inclusion es proposed 'critical habitat, <br />Section 3(5llC) of the Act stat.. that <br />"Except in those circumstances <br />determined by the Secretary. critical <br />habitat shell not include the entire <br />geographical area which can be <br />oceu pied by the threatened or <br />endangered speci~." ThIs proposal is in <br />compliance with the provisions of the <br />Act, as only a portion of the historical <br />range is proposed for designation. <br />A detailed discussion of the biological <br />basis for selection of each river reach <br />proposed for critical habitet will be <br />included in the biological support <br />document. This will includea <br />discussion of which attributes of tho <br />constituent elements may need to be <br />enhanced. <br /> <br />The critical habitat areas proposed <br />below are those that the Service believes <br />are required for the survival and <br />recovery of each speci.., Figure 1 <br />displays the total extent of proposed <br />critical hahitat for ell four species <br />combined, This includes the <br />considereble overlap of proposed <br />critical bahitat between species. A <br />specific description of the location of <br />aach area proposed for critical habita.l is <br />provided later in this rule, <br /> <br />B1WNO CODE 431o...a-M <br />