My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04422
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04422
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:24 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:19:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443
Description
Narrows Unit
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
4/5/1976
Author
David L Carlson
Title
Narrows Project Review
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'j <br /> <br />.' <br />cJ <br /> <br />1",,', <br />II.i-V <br /> <br />~l ., <br /> <br />1. The Bureau of Reclamation claims future improvements in technoloRY as ~ <br /> <br />proiect benefit. ~ eliminatinR these inappropriately claimed benefits, <br /> <br />direct and indirect irriRation benefits are reduced ~ 44%. <br /> <br />In order to ascertain irrigation repayment capacity and irrigation <br /> <br />benefits of the Narrows project, the Bureau developed an economic model of <br /> <br />a partially-irrigated farm with characteristics representative of the farms <br /> <br />in the project service area. (This is the procedure used in the 1966 <br /> <br />study, reference 1. Bureau economists have developed a more recent model <br /> <br />using a dryland farm as representative (see comment #2), but details are <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />not yet available.) <br /> <br />Repayment capacity is computed as follows. First, the amount of <br /> <br />water needed to fully irrigate the representative farm is computed. <br /> <br />Next, a detailed farm budget is drawn up which identifies crop yields, <br /> <br />gross income, . farm expenses and net income. Returns to investment, labor <br /> <br />and management are deducted from the net farm income to yield repayment <br /> <br />capacity; dividing this figure by the number of acre-feet of water needed <br /> <br />to fully irrigate the representative farm results in the repayment capacity <br /> <br />per acre-foot of water. In the 1966 study this amounted to $11.42 per <br /> <br />acre-foot at the farm headgate. <br /> <br />This procedure, based upon current estimates of yield, would seem to <br /> <br />measure the value of an acre-foot of project water. However, the Bureau <br /> <br />distinguishes between the value of an acre-foot of water for repayment <br /> <br />purposes and the economic benefit of an acre-foot of water. In order <br /> <br />to calculate the economic benefit of project water, the Bureau develops <br /> <br />a farm budget for its representative farm at the midpoint of a lOO-year <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.