Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r, <br />:.1 <br />I- <br />""..1 <br /> <br />:-... <br /> <br />-..J <br /> <br />Colonel John N Reese <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />Table 2 includes the monthly depletions calculated as a percentage reduction <br />in flow of the San Juan River at Shiprock, New Mexico. The table shows that <br />the range of depletions resulting from operation of an enlarged Red Mesa <br />Reservoir includes no depletion at all in a dry year (1945/1990) to a 2.2 <br />percent depletion in November of a wet year (1948/1986). The highest annual <br />depletion for the years analyzed was 0.29 percent in an average year <br />(1944/1978). The analysis shows that most of the depletion will occur in the <br />months of January through April, although in some wet and average years <br />depletions will occur in November, December, and Mayas well. For the years <br />analyzed, the highest monthly diversion from the La Plata River was 2,314 <br />acre-feet in April of the average year 1978, which constitutes a 1.7 percent <br />depletion to the San Juan River at Shiprock in the same month of the similar <br />year 1944. The highest annual diversion was 3,538 acre-feet in the wet year <br />1986, which constitutes a 0.23 percent depletion to the San Juan River at <br />Shiprock in the similar year 1948. <br /> <br />As previously stated, while water from the La Plata River would be diverted to <br />Red Mesa Reservoir primarily during the winter and early spring, the Project <br />could ultimately affect flows throughout the year. Modifications to Navajo <br />Dam operations are required by the reasonable and prudent alternative for the <br />Animas-La Plata Project to achieve a more natural flow regime in the San Juan <br />River. Reducing the unnaturally high winter flows would allow more water to <br />be stored for release during the runoff. However, the proposed reduction in <br />winter releases from Navajo Dam may not be entirely achieved if water is <br />needed downstream to replace that depleted by Red Mesa Reservoir. If less <br />winter water is stored in Navajo Reservoir, less water might be available for <br />release during the runoff and other times of the year. The frequency at which <br />Red Mesa Reservoir diversions would affect operations of Navajo Dam depends on <br />the frequency at which large Red Mesa Reservoir diversions coincide with <br />relatively low San Juan River flows. The Project's effect on Navajo Dam <br />operations also depends on the outcome of ongoing research and the final <br />recommendations for winter releases from Navajo Reservoir. In the worst case, <br />the Project's effect on (percent reduction of) runoff flows in the San Juan <br />River would be considerably less than the calculated percentage depleti~ns <br />shown in Table 2 because the Project diversions would constitute a <br />substantially lower portion of the San Juan River runoff flows than of the San <br />Juan River winter flows. For example, the largest monthly diversion for the <br />years analyzed is 2,314 acre-feet in April 1978 which is 1.7 percent of the <br />San Juan River flow at Shiprock in April of the corresponding average year <br />1944. This same April 1978 diversion is only 0.76 percent of the San Juan <br />River flow in June (the peak of the runoff) 1944. The entire quantity of <br />water diverted in 1978, 3,062 acre-feet, is 1.00 percent of the San Juan River <br />flow in June 1944. <br /> <br />A possible result of the Project, at least in some years, is to reduce winter <br />flows without affecting Navajo Dam operations. In this case, the reduction in <br />winter flows could contribute to the return to a more natural flow regime in <br />the San Juan River during the winter. The results of ongoing research could <br />help to identify and quantify the effects of reducing winter flows on <br />endangered fishes. <br />