My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04394
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04394
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:16 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:18:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.43.A
Description
Grand Valley/Orchard Mesa
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/22/1994
Title
The Grand Valley of Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />hold a 1946 priority (a storage right of 252,678 acre-feet and a direct flow right of 788 cfs). <br />Thus Green Mountain has a better legal right to Blue River water than Dillon. The parties <br />also agreed, however, that Denver could use its storage on Williams Fork to release water to <br />the Colorado River in exchange for Blue River water it could store in Dillon. More recently. <br />Denver helped finance construction of the Colorado River Water Conservation District's <br />Wolford Mountain Reservoir on Muddy Creek, north of KremmIing. Denver will use its <br />share of the yield of Wolford Mountain as releases to substitute for Green Mountain water it <br />stores in Dillon Reservoir and transports to the Front Range. <br />In the efforts to settle the Orchard Mesa Check case, three interests have emerged as <br />those potentially most affected: the so-called "preferred beneficiaries" of Green Mountain <br />water, the Green Mountain contract water users, and the oil shale interests.44 Preferred <br />beneficiaries are those West Slope users with water rights that were diverting water by 1977 <br />- considered to total 66,000 acre-feet of water, Contract users are those holding contract <br />rights for delivery of water out of Green Mountain. About 10,000 acre-feet of water has been <br />committed to date out of a designated pool of 20,000 acre-feet in Green Mountain. Oil shale <br />interests generally hold junior conditional water rights with an appropriation date of 1955 or <br />later. <br /> <br />Orchard Mesa is seeking approval to operate the check only as necessary to meet the <br />senior GVrC right of 520 cfs, not the "enlargement" of about 120 cfs with a priority date <br />junior to that of Orchard Mesa. In the 1980s, Orchard Mesa determined that the added <br />expenses of operating the check only made sense when it was legally required to do so, and <br />the Colorado State Engineer agreed that OMID was not obligated to operate the check in <br />other circumstances. Studies indicate, however, that operation of the check reduces the need <br />for releases from Green Mountain Reservoir by as much as 30,000 acre-feet in a dry year.4S <br />Water uses in the Grand Valley affect upstream uses in the Colorado River Basin. <br />Compensatory storage facilities for two Bureau of Reclamation projects, Green Mountain <br /> <br />.. Personal communication from Glenn Porzak, Attorney, Holme Robens &. Owen, December 19, 1994. <br /> <br />" Colorado River Water Conservation District, Proposed Solution to the Orchard Mesa "Check" Problem, Draft, <br />9/22/88. <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.