My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04394
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04394
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:16 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:18:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.43.A
Description
Grand Valley/Orchard Mesa
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/22/1994
Title
The Grand Valley of Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />from natural sources while 37 percent result from irrigation.22 Salinity affects the quality of <br />the drinking water that comes from the Colorado River in the Lower Basin and also makes <br />the water less .desirable for other domestic, municipal. and industrial uses. It can limit the <br />types of crops that can be grown as well as the yield of those crops. In 1961, when highly <br />saline drainage water from the Wellton-Mohawk Division of the Gila Project in Arizona <br />pushed salinity levels in the Colorado River at the Mexican border to more than 2,000 parts <br />per million of total dissolved solids, damllge to crops in the MexicaIi Valley caused an <br />international incident. 23 <br />One response to this incident was the passage of the Colorado River Basin Salinity <br />Control Act in 1974.24 This law provided federal funding to construct projects in the basin <br />that would reduce salt loading to the Colorado River. One of these projects became the <br />Grand Valley Salinity Control Unit. The original plan called for actions that were expected to <br />reduce salt loading to the river by as much as 410,000 tons annually. <br />Stage I of the Grand Valley Salinity Control Unit was essentially completed in 1983. <br />The effort focused on a 6.7 mile section of the Government Highline Canal in the western <br />part of the Grand Valley. The canal was lined, and diversion structures for laterals were <br />rebuilt. In addition, 34 miles of open dirt laterals were transfonned into about 30 miles of <br />plastic pipe. In Stage II, 38 miles of the canal in the eastern part of the valley are being lined <br />with polyvinyl chloride; 144 miles of open ditch laterals are to be replaced by pipes, <br />The salinity control project brought pennanent change to irrigated agriculture in the <br />Grand Valley. Because that change is still underway, it is difficult to assess its full <br />implications. One immediate effect was that irrigation activities in the valley, practices that <br />had been in existence with virtually no change for 50 to 70 years or more came under intense <br />scrutiny. A system, or more accurately a collection of systems, that had met their clear <br />objective when they were designed and constructed of providing a reliable and low cost <br /> <br />22 Taylor O. Miller, Gary D. Weatherford, John E. Thorson, The SallY Colorado (The Conservation Foundation <br />1986) at S. <br /> <br />23 Id. at 24. <br /> <br />24 Publ L. No. 93-320, 43 U.S.C.~ IS'!. <br /> <br />I I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.