Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,MAY-15-1998 15:50 <br /> <br />BOR LULND <br /> <br />9706633212 P.ll/24 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />productive habitats; in recent years, flooded gravel pits may haye provided <br />the only comparable habitat. <br /> <br />The IS-mile reach has experienced major agricultural water depletions for <br />many years. During late summer and early fall, this reach can be severely <br />dewatered. Water depletions in the IS-mile reach have been identified as <br />a limiting factor for Colorado squawffsh. Therefore, the Service has <br />developed year-round flow recommendations for the IS-mile reach. These flow <br />recommendations are based on adult Colorado squawflsh habitat preferences, <br />stage v. habitat quantity and quality relationships, and discharge thresholds <br />for sediment transport (Osmundson et al. 1995). <br /> <br />Razorback Sucker <br /> <br />The razorback sucker, an endemic specfes unique to the Colorado River Basin, <br />was historically abundant and widely distributed within warmwater reaches <br />throughout the Colorado River Basin. Historically, razorback suckers were <br />found in the main stem Colorado River and major tributaries in Arizona, <br />California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, and in Mexico (Ellis <br />1914; Minckley 1983). Bestgen (1990) reported that this species was once so <br />numerous that it was commonly used as food by early settlers and, further, <br />that commercially marketable quantities were caught in Arizona as recently as <br />1949. In the Upper Basin, razorback suckers were reported in the Green River <br />to be very abundant near Green River, Utah, in the late 1800's (Jordan 1891). <br />An account in Osmundson and Kaeding (1989) reported that residents living <br />along the Colorado River near Clifton, Colorado, observed several thousand <br />razorback suckers during spring runoff In the 1930's and early 1940's. In the <br />San Juan River drainage, Platania and Voung (1989) relayed historical accounts <br />of razorback suckers ascending the Animas River to Durango, Colorado, around <br />the turn of the century. <br /> <br />A marked decline in populations of razorback suckers can be attributed to <br />construction of dams and reseryoirs, introduction of nonnative fishes, and <br />removal of large quantities of water from the Colorado River system. Dams on <br />the main stem Colorado Rlyer and its major tributaries have segmented the <br />river system and drastically altered flows, temperatures, and channel <br />geomorphology. Major changes In species composition have occurred due to the <br />introduction of numerous nonnative fishes, many of which have thrived due to <br />man-induced changes to the natural riverine system. <br /> <br />The current distribution and abundance of the razorback sucker have been <br />significantly reduced throughout the Colorado River system (McAda 1987; McAda <br />and Wydoski 1980; Holden and Stalnaker 1975; Minckley 1983; Marsh and Minckley <br />1989; Tyus 1987). The only substantial population of razorback suckers <br />remaining, made up entirely of old adults (McCarthy and Minckley 1987), is <br />found in lake Mohave; however, they do not appear to be successfully <br />recruiting. While limited numbers of razorback suckers perSist in other <br />locations in the lower Colorado River, they are considered rare or incidental <br />and may be continuing to decl ine. <br />