Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />l"i "'II)' ~!. <br />:J '~~ ;:) .~ ~J t <br /> <br />- 5 - <br /> <br />Assuming these "guesstimates" as somewhere near right, nearly <br /> <br />450,000 acre-feet arell.pplied annually to the 130,000 total of irrigated <br /> <br /> <br />land, about 3.5 acre-feet per acre in addition to the rainfall. <br /> <br /> <br />However, the consumptive use is only 119,000 acre-feet or 26% of the <br /> <br /> <br />total applied. Putting it another way, the return flows in the District of <br /> <br /> <br />304,000 acre-feet are about 2! times the consumptive use. <br /> <br /> <br />The official records indicate an even lower consumptive use in <br /> <br />District Si3ty-four. <br /> <br />liith an average recorded discharge of 258,000 acre-feet at Balzac <br />and 319,000 at Julesburg, the river actually gains 61,000 acre-feet over alid <br /> <br />above the diversions. <br /> <br />Diversions for direct use of 188,600 acre-feet and 17,600 for storage <br />(Julesburg Reservoir) total 206,200. Adding this to the Julesburg flow <br />and subtracting the Balzac discharge, we get 267,200 acre-feet as the avel'f;ge,j <br />return flow, in the 75 miles of river, an average of about 5.0 a.F.S. per mil.le~ <br /> <br />This can be partly explained by the occasional flood waters in <br /> <br /> <br />several tributary streams but from averages computed from records kept by the! <br /> <br /> <br />llater Commissioner, they I"ould not affect the results more than 2 or 3%. <br /> <br />The table below summarizes the operation of the three reservoirs. <br /> Capacity Av. Av. ~ " <br /> Diverted Dischar e D"y.i <br />10. Sterling 87, 400 89,300 62,880 72 70 <br />Preld tt 32,300 43,100 11,140 35 25 <br />Julesburg 28,180 17,490 15,210 54 $6 <br /> 141 880 149 900 89 230 62 <br /> Loss 60,700 38 41. <br /> <br />',1;-i :l If ~" <br /> <br />~d,' Jtl<:i"'i: <br /> <br />,,_'.c-..; _. <br /> <br />,-,,"-';; <br /> <br />.-",_i-/-,~",;.'-,it,. ;;;.4'~>.;_~::c.-' <br /> <br />