My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04363
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:17:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/6/1951
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the questions of how and where the silt would be deposited were largely <br />forgotten, although some short-lived exc~tement was created in 1935 when <br />mudqy water was suddenly discharged through the outlet pipes. <br /> <br />At about the same time an investigator at California Institute of <br />Technology was experimenting with a stream of colored salt water, slightly <br />heavier than ordinary water, introduced ihto clear water of ordinary weight. <br />He found that under certain circumstances, the stream would travel long dis- <br />tances through clear water without greatly losing identity. To study these <br />phenomena further, the National Research Council in 1937 established a <br />Committee on Density Currents. The committee realized that the muddy <br />discharge at Hoover Dam, in 1935 might have indicated that a current of <br />muddy water had traveled the entire length of Lake Mead. Similar phenomena <br />had been observed at Elephant Butte Dam. Thus, there was evidence of density <br />currents not only in the laboratory but ihreservoirs. A subcommittee of the <br />Density Current Committee, formed to trace possible density currents in Lake <br />Mead, reported in 1941 that at certain times of year inflow followed the old <br />river bed along the bottom of the reservoir, without greatly intermixing with <br />the standing water, and finally became di~sipated at the dam. It also dis- <br />closed that substantial volumes of silt ha,d accumulated immediately upstream <br />from the dam. Since the lake is perfectly Clear, this silt could have been <br />transported the long distance from the head of the reservoir only by means <br />of density currents. ' <br /> <br />The volume of silt deposited near, the dam was only a small portion <br />of the estimated volume of the total silt inflow. Where had the rest 'of the <br />silt been deposited? Only a thorough sedi~entation survey could furnish the <br />answer.- Thanks to the wholehearted cooperation of the Navy, Geological <br />Survey, Coast and Geodetic Survey, and Bureau of Reclamation, this unprece- <br />dented survey was completed in 1950. <br /> <br />From the time the reservoir began; to fill until the survey was <br />done, approximately 2,004,000,000 tons of silt entered the reservoir. It <br />occupies a space of 1,420,000 acre-feet, corresponding roughly to an average <br />unit weight of 64.8 pounds per cubic foot., The greatest depth of silt was <br />at the upper reaches of the reservoir, far'above the silt pocket provided <br />when the dam was designed, and thus largely within the useful operating <br />volume of the lake. The maximum depth was;270 feet. Proceeding toward the <br />dam, the depth of silt decreased, but deposits 45 to 160 feet deep were found <br />along the original river channel almost the entire distance'to the dam. At <br />the dam the deposit had a thickness of 106 feet. Smaller accumulations were <br />in the Virgin Basin and at the mouth of Virgin River. Only 42 percent of <br />the total silt volume was within the desigqated silt pocket below the <br />lowest outlet gates. On the basis of data 'gathered in the survey, and <br />taking into account the increasing compaction as additional layers are <br />added, it is estimated that with no additional storage upstream, it would <br />be almost 500 years before all storage capacity of Lake Mead were lost. <br />However, it may be assumed that other storage will be constructed upstream <br />long before the operating volume of Lake Mead is reduced, to any important <br />extent. <br /> <br />Related phenomena investigated during the sedimentation survey <br />included the salinity of the lake, evaporation from the surface, and the <br />general subsidence of the area covered by the enormous weight of water and <br /> <br />-36- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.