Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OJ;)4 27 <br /> <br />.' ~ <br />..: <br /> <br />'.;". <br /> <br />Descriptions of the Program Changes (1989-97) <br />and a User Manual for a Transit-Loss Accounting <br />Program Applied to Fountain Creek Between <br />Colorado Springs and the Arkansas River, Colorado <br /> <br />'"' <br /> <br />By Gerhard Kuhn, E.L Samuels, WD, Bemis, andR.D, Steger <br /> <br />Abstract <br /> <br />Since April 1989, a FORTRAN computer <br />program has been used to compute transit losses <br />for transmountain return flows (TRF's) in Foun- <br />tain Creek, The transit-loss accounting program, <br />which was developed as a result of a study <br />completed in 1987 and is described in a previous <br />report, enables daily accounting of (1) the TRF's, <br />(2) the transit losses for the TRF's, and (3) the <br />native streamflow (NSF) (nontransmountain <br />water) in Fountain Creek between the City of <br />Colorado Springs (CCS) and the Arkansas River. <br />After 1989, a number of changes were made to <br />the accounting program; however, the program <br />and the changes never have been documented <br />completely, To document the accounting program, <br />a study was done by the U,S, Geological Survey, <br />in cooperation with the City of Colorado Springs, <br />Department of Public Utilities, and the South- <br />eastern Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />(SECWCD) to document the program changes <br />and the use of the Fountain Creek transit-loss <br />accounting program, Specifically, this report <br />(1) describes the computational steps and proce- <br />dures of the accounting program; (2) describes the <br />changes that were made to the program in 1991- <br />92 and in 1994-95; (3) provides a user manual; <br />and (4) documents the procedures for maintaining <br />the accounting program, the auxiliary programs, <br />and \he numerous output files, <br /> <br />.'." <br /> <br />:> <br /> <br />Changes to the accounting program that <br />were made during 1991-92 and during 1994-95 <br />included (I) adding the capability to account for <br />diversion of the TRF's; (2) allowing for the input <br />of TRF's at locations other than at the CCS waste- <br />water-treatment facility; (3) incorporating an <br />additional streamflow-gaging station into the <br />program computations; and (4) adding the capa- <br />bility for the SECWCD to account for TRF's <br />derived from \he Fryingpan-Arkansas Project <br />The program also was modularized to make it <br />more understandable and to make the changes <br />easier to implement <br />To compute the estimated quantities of TRF <br />and the associated transit losses, the accounting <br />program uses two sets of computations, The first <br />set of computations is made between any two <br />adjacent gaging stations (stream-segment compu- <br />tations); these computations estimate the loss or <br />gain in NSF between the two adjacent gaging <br />stations, The second set of computations is made <br />between any two adjacent nodes (subreach <br />computations); the actual transit-loss computa- <br />tions are made in the subreach computations, <br />using the result from the stream-segment compu- <br />tations, <br />Use ofthe accounting program is simplified <br />through an interactive program display that has <br />four options used to (I) compute transit losses on <br />a day-to-day basis, (2) analyze different NSF <br />diversion alternatives, (3) recompute the transit <br />losses for a previous day, and (4) view or change <br /> <br />.\ <br /> <br />,', <br /> <br />.:~ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />,C'. <br /> <br />Abstract <br /> <br />" I <br /> <br />.;. <br />