Laserfiche WebLink
<br />UJBHO <br /> <br />:. <br /> <br />stores the data, and transntits the stored data every <br />4 hours to a satellite. Additionally, each data-collec- <br />tion platform is programmed to transmit every <br />15 minutes when threshold gage-height limits are <br />exceeded during times of high flow. The data are <br />retransntitted from the satellite to satellite downlinks <br />and transferred to the streamflow data base contained <br />in the USGS computer system. <br />Discharge data are computed from the gage- <br />height data using a stage-discharge rating developed <br />from discharge measurements that are made at vari- <br />able gage heights. The sand, shale, and cobble chan- <br />nels at all of the gaging stations are extremely unstable <br />and require discharge measurements at weekly to <br />biweekly frequencies, depending on the extent of <br />hydraulic changes in the channel conditions. Because <br />of changes in the channel conditions, the stage- <br />discharge relations at the gaging stations may differ <br />from \he stage-discharge rating that was developed. <br />Therefore, to compute the current correct discharge, <br />corrections are made to the stage-discharge rating by <br />applying shifts to the transntitted gage-height data; the <br />shifts usually are distributed on the basis of time and <br />stage. The discbarges are calculated by the computer <br />as they are received from the satellite downlink and <br />stored in the data base. The discharge data are checked <br />for accuracy on a daily basis, including weekends; <br />during high flows and extreme low flows, the data may <br />be checked several times a day. Shift adjustments also <br />are made if the discharge at a gaging station does not <br />appear consistent with discharge at the adjacent <br />stations, after allowing for possible known inflows and <br />diversions between the stations. <br />The discharges that are computed at 15-minute <br />intervals and stored in the data base are retrieved auto- <br />matically on a nightly basis by additional computer <br />programs developed for that purpose. These programs <br />compute the daily mean discharge for each gaging <br />station for the appropriate 24-hour period (fig. 3) and <br />write the discharges to a data file accessible by the <br />agencies that use the accounting program. The daily <br />mean discharge data also are reviewed daily by USGS <br />personnel; any corrections in these data that are <br />needed as a result of changes in the applied shifts are <br />loaded into a second data file of revised discharges for <br />use as needed (see the ''Transit-Loss Accounting <br />Program Files" section, p. 27-30). <br />Operation of \hese gaging stations requires thor- <br />ough knowledge of the hydrology of Fountain Creek <br />and the ability to interpret the changing channel and <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />control conditions at each station. The entire process <br />of providing the most accurate real-time discharge <br />data as possible for the accounting program requires <br />constant and intensive attention. <br /> <br />CHANGES TO THE TRANSIT-LOSS <br />ACCOUNTING PROGRAM <br />DURING 1991-92 <br /> <br />In 1991, the CCS planned to modify the TRF <br />use and reuse program to enable ditch owners along <br />Fountain Creek to purchase and divert some of the <br />TRF's to supplement their NSF diversions. This diver- <br />sion (1) would benefit the ditch owners, especially <br />those having the more junior water rights, by <br />providing an additional source of irrigation water and <br />(2) would benefit the CCS by decreasing transit losses <br />because losses would not accrue downstream to the <br />mouth of Fountain Creek for the diverted TRF's. <br />Through an agreement with \he SEcWCD, the <br />diverted TRF's were considered to be return-flow <br />deliveries of FAF water, and the divened TRF's could <br />be exchanged by the CCS for equivalent quantities of <br />FAP water being stored in Pueblo Reservoir <br />(Thomas C. Simpson, SECWCD, oral commun., <br />1997). <br />In addition, the CCS wanted to include TRF's in <br />the accounting program that resulted from water use <br />on the Fort Carson Military Reservation (south of the <br />CCS and west of Fountain Creek; not shown in figs. 1 <br />and 2) and that entered Fountain Creek through Clover <br />Ditch (actually a drain) in the vicinity of station <br />07105800 (fig. 2). Finally, besides changing the <br />program to accommodate the proposed diversion of <br />TRF's for irrigation and the additional TRF source, the <br />physical structure of the program was changed to <br />make it more modular, and the program output also <br />was changed. <br />The changes to the program are described in the <br />next four sections of this report; \he modified <br />accounting program that resulted from these changes <br />was put in operation in April 1992. Although these <br />and subsequent changes made to the program were <br />considerable, the changes primarily affected \he input <br />and output handling of the various discharge quanti- <br />ties; the basic algorithms used to calculate transit <br />losses (Kuhn, 1988, p. 76-85) were not changed. <br /> <br />, <br />l I <br /> <br />14 Descriptions of the Program Changes (198~7) and a User Manuat for a Tran.lt.Loas Accounting Program <br />Apptled to fountain Creek Betwaen Colorado Sprtnga and the Arkanaa. Rtver, Cotorado <br />