Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Beneficial Consumptive Uses <br /> <br />An extensive discussion of consumptive uses is not attempted <br />in this report as that subject has been treated in detail in <br />Reclamalion's "Colorado River System C9nsumptive Uses <br />and Losses Report, 1981-1985." This report has been <br />prepared jointly by the Upper and Lower Colorado Regional <br />Offices and is due to be released in 1988. II presents estimates <br />of the consumptive uses and losses from the Colorado River <br />System for each year from 1981 through 1985, The table on <br />the following page summarizes annuai water use from the <br />system by States, including water use supplied by <br />ground-water overdraft. <br /> <br />Upper Basin Uses and Losses <br /> <br />The three largest categories of consumptive use in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basjn afe agricultural uses within the basin, <br />translJasin diversions to adjacent drainages. and evaporation <br />losses 6:0111 the Illajor reservoirs of the Colorado River <br />System. During water year 1987, the estimated use for <br />municipal and industrial supply and for agriculture in the <br />Upper Basin was 2,900,000 acre-feel. Estimated evaporation <br />losses were 610,000 acre-feet from mainstem reservoirs, <br />About 670,000 acre-feet was diverted for use in adjacent <br />drainages. Total estimated consumptive use amounted to <br />3,800,000 acre-feel. Stonlge in the Upper Basin mainstem <br />reservoirs decreased by approximately 871,000 acre-feet <br />during water year \987, <br /> <br />Lower Basin Uses and Losses <br /> <br />During water year 1987, an estimated 5,2 MAF of water were <br />released from Lake Havasu to meet the requirements for <br />water deliveries at Imperial Dam, as well as those of the <br />Colorado River indian Reservation near Parker, Ariz.ona, the <br />Palo Verde Irrigation District near Blythe, California, other <br />miscellaneous users along the river, and transit losses between <br />Parker Dat11 and Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />The major water diversions above Parker Dam were by MWD <br />and the CAP. MWD pumped approximately 1.31 MAF from <br />Lake Havasu during water year 1987 and approximately <br />356,000 acre-feet were pumped for the CAP. <br /> <br />Releases of approximately 6,9 MAF were made from Lake <br />Mohave during water year 1987, to provide for releases to <br />meet minimum downstream needs in the United States at <br />Parker Dam; to supply diversion requirements of MWD and <br />CAP. miscellaneous contractors, and oth~r users~ to offset <br />evaporation and other transit losses between Da vis and <br />Parker Dams; and to maintain the scheduled levels of Lake <br />Havasu. <br /> <br />During water year 1987, releases of approximately 6,8 MAF <br />were made from Lake Mead at Hoover Dam to regulate the <br />levels of Lake Mohave and to provide for the small users from <br />that reservoir, and to provide for releases at Davis Dam to <br />meet needs in the United States. In addition, 180,000 acre-feet <br />were diverted from Lake Mead for use by the Lake Mead <br />National Recreation Area, Boulder City, Basic Management, <br />Inc, and contmctors of the Colorado River Commission of <br />Nevada, Total releases and diversions from Lake Mead <br />during water year 1987 were an estimated 13.32 MAF. <br /> <br />For water year 1988, a total release of 8,7 MAF from Lake <br />Havasu is projected, including consumptive use requirements <br />in the United States below Parker Dam, transit losses and <br />regulation in the river between Parker Dam and the Mexican <br />Border, flood control requirements, and treaty deliveries to <br />Mexico. <br /> <br />During water year 1988, MWD is expected to divert 1.34 MAF <br />by pumping from Lake Havasu, The CAP is expected to <br />pump approximately 747,000 acre-feel. Consumptive uses by <br />small users, river losses or gains, and reservoir losses between <br />Davis Dam and Parker Dam are projected to be a net loss of <br />7,000 acre-feet, <br /> <br />There are no major users between Hoover Dam and Davis <br />Dam, During water year 1988 the net diversions from Lake <br />Mead are projected at 140,000 acre-feet. Evaporation from <br />Lake Mead is projected to be about 980,000 acre-feet and net <br />gain between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead is expected <br />to be about 780,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />23 <br />