My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04323
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04323
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:54:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:16:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/2/1982
Author
Raphael Moses
Title
Hard Water Makes Hard Law - Water Quality Modifications to the Law of the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />'~ "-' <br /> <br />9,600 parts per million. Estimated cost of the desalting plant <br /> <br />~ and associated works was $98 million. <br />CD <br />CD It was anticipated that a new concrete-lined canal would <br />00 <br />je co;.s~~~c~ed ~o replace the ~irst 49 miles of then unlined <br /> <br />~~~~~OD c= t~e C0ac~Ella Canal. This, together with associated <br /> <br />works, was estimated to cost $21,450,000. <br /> <br />Mexico received major new benefits from the new agreements. <br /> <br />She received a guaranteed quality at Morelos Dam related to the <br /> <br />quality of water at Imperial Dam. All of the costs in money or <br /> <br />water to achieve this quality guarantee were borne by the United <br /> <br />States., Mexico had the promise of financial assistance with <br /> <br />respect to salinity problems, including tile drainage in Mexicali <br /> <br />Valley. <br /> <br />In addition, the United States would support efforts by <br /> <br />Mexico to obtain favorable financing for the improvement and <br /> <br />rehabilitation of Mexicali Valley. Also at the United States' <br /> <br />expense, a concrete-lined canal was constructed in Mexico to <br /> <br />discharge saline water to the Gulf of California. <br /> <br />The United States negotiators believed there were consid- <br /> <br />erable tangible benefits to the United States. <br /> <br />The agreement <br /> <br />eliminated the possibility of long years of acrimonious contro- <br /> <br />versy between the two countries. <br /> <br />The agreement did not require <br /> <br />any payment~ to Mexico for any past damages. Since the agreement <br /> <br />was described as a permanent solution, presumably Mexico waived <br /> <br />any future rights to press for monetary damages. Mexico agreed <br /> <br />permanently to accept 140,000 acre-feet per year of their treaty <br /> <br />water at the Arizona-Sonora boundary. <br /> <br />This is largely drainage <br /> <br />water with a salinity considerably higher than that of the <br /> <br />,'\"""." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.