Laserfiche WebLink
<br />360 flow occurred during spring runoff (March-July) (Bliesner and Lamarra, 2000) with mean daily <br />361 peaks at Bluff UT ranging from 3,810 to 33,800 cfs and averaging 10,500 cfs, The highest peaks <br />362 have actually occurred during summer and fall thunderstorms and reached an estimated 70,000 <br />363 cfs at Bluff UT in September, 1927 (USGS data). Prior to Navajo Dam, annual flow was quite <br />364 variable, ranging from 618,000 afto over 4,000,000 afat Bluff; median annual flow was <br />365 1,620,000 af. . Summer low flows occasionally reached zero pre-dam and monthly mean flows <br />366 were as low as 65 cfs. While low summer flows are a natuqil condition, these very low flows <br />367 occurred due to a combination of irrigation diversions and dry. periods. Following operation of <br />368 Navajo Dam, spring peaks were substantially decreased (post-dam peaks averaged <br />369 54 percent of pre-dam peaks) and flows for the remainder of the year increased (August-February <br />370 flows averaged ]68 percent higher). <br /> <br />371 Beginning in 1991 test flows to determine effects on endangered fish were provided from Navajo <br />372 Dam, including spring releases of 5,000 cfs to increase downstream peaks. This test period <br />373 showed that operation changes could successfully better mimic a natural hydrograph (see <br />374 Attachment D for graph of flows during test period). The test period also showed that the <br />375 cooling effect of Navajo Dam on water flows extended further downstream with the high <br />376 releases. <br /> <br />377 Tables and figures on the following pages compare average reservoir elevations and river flows <br />378 between the No Action alternative and the proposed plan. Figure 2 tracks average water surface <br />379 elevation at Navajo Reservoir under both alternatives. Table I estimates flow levels at different <br />380 gage locations on the San Juan and Animas Rivers under the alternatives. Figure 3 gives an <br />381 indication on the frequency certain flows would be expected at the Archuleta gage under the <br />382 alternatives. Under the proposed plan, average monthly releases of 250 cfs would occur 28 <br />383 percent of the months in the winter and 29 percent of the months in the March thru November <br />384 period. Overall monthly releases would be below 500 cfs 98 percent of the time in the winter <br />385 and 65 percent of the time the remainder of the year. <br /> <br />386 The Archuleta gage is approximately 6 miles downstream from the dam and approximately I <br />387 mile upstream from the Citizens' Ditch, a major diversion. Thus, flows would be much lower <br />388 downstream from the Citizens' Ditch than shown at the Archuleta gage. Even lower flows would <br />389 occur just downstream from the Hammond Diversion Dam, approximately 20 miles downstream <br />390 from the dam. During the 2001 Low Flow Test (Dam releases were lowered to around 250 cfs), <br />391 flows fell to,133 cfs downstream from the Citizens' Ditch and 63 cfs downstream from the <br />392 Hammond Diversion. Under actual low flow conditions, flows may be less or greater than these <br />393 amounts. Table 2 summarizes river flows measured during the Low Flow Test <br />394 <br />395 The No Action alternative does not mimic the natural hydrograph and it is assumed that projects <br />396 that rely on such mimicry for ESA compliance (for example, Animas-LaPlata and completion of <br />397 NIlP) would not occur. Under No Action, it is assumed that Navajo Dam would be operated as it <br />398 was from 1973 to 1991, with a minimum release of 500 cfs. Operational goals include to store as <br />399 much water in the reservoir as possible and to maintain uniform flows downstream. <br /> <br />13 <br />