<br />C -, A''''~
<br />, i/;.'.HJ
<br />
<br />280
<br />
<br />But it should be clear that another and perhaps
<br />a greater duty is placed on us-forced on us, if you
<br />will. We must endeavor to create a condition of
<br />affairs in which war slllill become improbable and
<br />in which peace can be compelled. This is the com-
<br />bined task of endeavoring to create a world 'of
<br />friendly states, of good neighbors, and of being
<br />prepared to prevent war, by force if need be, when
<br />it once more threatens. We have twice learned
<br />that a War anywhere, remote from our shores and
<br />from our minds, nevertheless can force us to stand
<br />to arms, It should not be neceSsary to learn that
<br />,lesson a third time,
<br />And yet., because memory is short, we have to
<br />teach this year in and year out. Who does not
<br />remember the systematic teaching that war could
<br />accomplish nothing; the pathetic assertion that
<br />a nation which behaved itself need not fear any
<br />, wrong-doer; that foreign disputes were of no inter.
<br />est to us! And one remembers,grimIy, the French
<br />traitor, Marcel Deat, urging his country not to keep
<br />its alliance with Britain and resist Gennany, by
<br />trying to make out that the Nazi plan of world
<br />conquest was a local I'm" between Germany arid
<br />Poland. "Why die for Danzig!" he asked, while
<br />the German fifth columnists (his friends) were
<br />undermining the very defenses of Paris. Yet
<br />there are people even now who favor in their inno-
<br />cence what Deat said in ,his treason, who ask why
<br />Americans should be conccrned with North Africa
<br />or with Italy, wi~h a second front, or with th"
<br />Solomon Islands. The a!'swer is the same: the
<br />enemy which seized Danzig was thundering into the
<br />, north of France a few months later. The enemy
<br />which seized the islands of the Pacific boasted~
<br />'and actually hoped-that it would dictate' sur.
<br />render in Washington: The savage truth of
<br />Litvinov's remark that peace is indivisible, proved
<br />in blood and sorrow, must not and cannot be
<br />forgotten.
<br />It follows, therefore, that the United States, if
<br />she is t{) retain her place as a land of peace and
<br />progress and self-fulfilment, must do her utmost
<br />to create a condition of affairs and to organize
<br />world relations so that the peace can be kept.
<br />To. do this we must face a number of tasks to
<br />which we are not accustomed and which we shall
<br />find extremely hard. Let us look at II few of
<br />them.
<br />
<br />,
<br />,
<br />,
<br />
<br />DEPARTMENT OF STATE BULLETIN
<br />
<br />First is the, necessity of making, keeping, and
<br />,holding an Americanpoint{)f view. This is eB-
<br />sential. The time has long since passed when for-
<br />mation 'of American, opinion in foreign relationB
<br />, could safely follow lines laid down abroad. Most
<br />countries are interested in promoting their own
<br />:national interests. Many of them have relied on
<br />shifting policies and on changing alliances, and
<br />some have been opportunist in their ,policies, doing
<br />what seemed and perhaps was necessary to them'
<br />for their own safety. We need not claim moral
<br />superiority" It happens that through good for-
<br />tune and geography we are relatively more secure
<br />than most countries and therefore can exercise the
<br />high privilege of endeavoring to deal in foreign
<br />affairs on:a basis, of fairness and justice. We have
<br />resources enough' so that we can respect the needs
<br />of other, more crowded populations who must ex-
<br />port 'in order to feed their people, We have
<br />learned that neighbors who are highly developed
<br />and widely industrialized do not threaten us by
<br />their competition but are actually better customers.
<br />Accordingly, we find it both advantageous as well
<br />as neighborly to assist the less developed coun.
<br />tries in their technical education and advance. We
<br />have learned that the cooperation 'of a friend is
<br />far more useful to us and to the world, than the
<br />reluctant help dragged from a dominated country.
<br />In the language of diplomacy, we have learned to
<br />recognize that good-neighborship, accompanied by
<br />recognition of the sovereign equality of our neigh-
<br />bors, is not only honesty but also good policy. '
<br />The position onh'e 'nation does not depend alone
<br />on its armed force or war potential. Even more
<br />tha'n arrris, the ideals and policies for which a coun-
<br />try stands determine its influence., The ,policy
<br />and practice o{the good-neighbor doctrine is reo
<br />sponsible, in large measure, for the influence which
<br />the United States has beyond its fighting lines.,
<br />More than that, the, hope of making the good-
<br />neighbor policy general throughout the world is
<br />perhaps the most solid basis for helieving that we
<br />can arrive at a successful world organization capa-
<br />ble of mnking and maintaining permanent peace.
<br />The maintenance of the' good-neighbor policy,
<br />which mearis also patience and understanding; be-
<br />,comes one of the great duties,of the United States.
<br />Hand in hand with this goes an.other duty-th.e
<br />duty to assure that American business interests
<br />acting abroad actively contribllte to building up
<br />
|