Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~. <br />.' <br />~~ <br /> <br />0::27J1 <br /> <br />titudy 1] <br /> <br /> <br />liii1 <br />.,W <br />i." <br />, . <br /> <br />This study is an evaluation of the apparent salvage ,in the Colorado lliver <br />abovs the station at Glem/ood i;;prings because of tZ'tlnsmotintain div-ersions for <br /> <br />:,~ <br />:~. <br />~'; . <br />r,., <br />:~ <br />;~ <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />:~ <br />:~ <br />;1 <br /> <br />; <br />'Rl <br />'~ <br />,; <br />) <br />:6 <br />ii' <br />: <br />n' <br />, <br /> <br />a historic period 1911 thru 1954. utilizing the :iix Index Supply Stations of <br /> <br />" <br />Study A 'and the" Index Stations on ai[91i1'icant tributariel/ below Hot Sulphur ' <br />I <br /> <br />Springs'as explained in Study II. <br /> <br />~le station for the ~gle River was <br /> <br />at Redcliff. The graphs and oorrelations developed are filed under Study <br />II. ;. plot using a base line drnvm thz'OUf:h points, for 1911 thru 1935, of <br />Index Supply versus Colorado Hiver a.t Glenwood :iprings, and later years <br /> <br />shown. Unaccountable depletions, or apparent salvage , occurs with few ex- <br /> <br /> <br />shov.n with accountAble and unnccOlmt..,ble depl~tions by water yeal's is also <br /> <br />ceptions, however, the inconsistency of' the magnitude 01' this salvage was <br /> <br />believed , in part, due to the Engle raVel' station at Hecliff not measuring\\ <br />a large eno,:\Gh portion of the total tributary flow of the Eaglet liivor. <br />For this reason the station of .l<;ar,le l!iver below Gypsum VIas used Wlstead of <br />at Redcliff, and the renults are suwnarizsd under Study II. <br /> <br /><I <br /> <br />I <br />:;, <br />"'" <br /> <br />'(-"',- <br /> <br />, ' <br /> <br />m <br />fJ;1 <br />..~ <br /> <br />..\:.". <br /> <br />[] <br />'[j <br /> <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br />