Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. <br /> <br />~ <br />C"-l <br />N <br />(;J <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />,', "~. <br /> <br />Shallow Ground Water in the Whitney Area, <br />Southeastern Las Vegas Valley, <br />Clark County, Nevada <br /> <br />Part n. Assessment of a Proposed Strategy to <br />Reduce the Contribution of Salts to <br />Las Vegas Wash <br /> <br />By Thomas J. Burbey <br /> <br />.......- <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />A continuing increase in the contribution of dissolved solids to Las Vegas Wash from various sources, <br />including ground-water seepage, has resulted in the proposal of several salt-reduction strategies. One such <br />strategy is the construction of an impoundment, or detention basin, consisting of a dike structure above <br />ground and a slurry wall beneath the dike that would extend,to the base of the shallow alluvial aquifer, The <br />dike-and-wall system was expected to function by damming deeper, more saline flow in the shallow aquifer, <br />while allowing only shallow, less saline flow to leave the detention basin. Theoretically, the shallow flow <br />would become increasingly fresh over time, because it would no longer come in contact with the Muddy <br />Creek Formation at the base of the shallow aquifer. which heretofore has been considered the principal <br />source of salts in the aquifer. <br /> <br />1bis report describes the results of a study made to detennine whether the proposed slurry wall could <br />be effective in inhibiting saline ground water from seeping to the wash under various possible geohydrologic <br />conditions. Field data were collected and analyzed and fluid- and solute-transport models were developed <br />to test the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. X-ray analyses indicate that salt-bearing minerals, <br />panicularly gypsum, are relatively abundant in the alluvial deposits that make up the aquifer, and are largely <br />responsible for the high dissolved-solids concentrations. <br /> <br />1l1ree conceptual and mathematical models were developed to analyze the effects of the proposed <br />slurry wall. Simulations of ground-water flow and solute transport were made using a finite-element model. <br />Simulation indicates that most ground-water flow is through the center part of the 3D-foot-thick aquifer <br />(between depths of 10 and 25 feet) and therefore does not come in contact with the underlying Muddy <br />Creek Formation; yet, the ground water is high in dissolved-solids concentration, In areas dominated by <br />phreatophytes, simulations have shown that evapotranspiration is the major process influencing the <br />distribution of dissolved solids. In areas dominated by hydrophytes and affected by effluent from upgradient <br />sewage-treatment plants. mixing of the more dilute effluent with the more saline shallow ground water is <br />the major influencing process. Simulation results also indicate that the slurry wall would not induce upward <br />flow in the shallow aquifer farther upgradient than under present conditions. Furthermore, the quantity of <br />flow at the base of the aquifer behind the slurry wall would not be reduced; rather, the flow would be <br />deflected upward immediately adjacent to the waiL Results indicate that the aquifer is too thin for the <br />proposed slurry wall to function as planned. Simulation indicates that much better results would be obtained <br />with the slurry wall if the aquifer was one order of magnitude thicker. Thus, the study indicates that the <br />proposed slurry wall would not decrease the dissolved-solids load entering Las Vegas Wash from the <br />existing shallow aquifer. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The study area, or Whitney area as it is referred to herein. is situated in the southeast part of Las <br />Vegas VaHey in Clark County, southern Nevada (fig, lA), The Whitney area received its name from the <br />U,S. Bureau of Reclamation's Whitney Verification Program, which in turn is named after the small <br />community of Whitney on the outskirts of southeastern Las Vegas. The l_mi2 study area (fig. lB) <br />represents only a small part of the overall valley, which encompasses about 1,540 mi2 (fig, lA). <br /> <br />-1- <br />