Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />..,. <br />C'J <br />N <br /> <br />c.:... <br />CJ <br /> <br />SIMULATING EFFECTS OF PROPOSED <br />SLURRY WALL ON GROUND-WATER FLOW <br />AND SOLUTE TRANSPORT <br /> <br />Preceding sections of this report describe the physical setting and hydrogeologic properties of the <br />alluvial deposits, ground-water flow rates, and ground-water chemistry in the Whitney area. This section <br />deals with the development of conceptual and mathematical models, using the infonnation described in <br />previous sections. to describe the effect the proposed slurry wall could have on ground-water flow and <br />solute transport in, and surrounding, the detention basin.'" <br /> <br />,'o.v <br /> <br />Three conceptual models were developed and tested using mathematical (numerical) models. 't'o <br />analyze effects of implementing the proposed slurry wall (which would extend through the entire thickness <br />of the aquifer beneath the dike structure). The fin;t model is a planimetric ground-water flow model (solute <br />transport is not included), which is designed to analyze flow characteristics in the vicinity of the detention <br />basin. In other words, the model is intended to determine (1) whether ground water will continue to <br />recharge the basin or whether, after some period of time. flow will be diverted around the basin as water <br />levels rise behind the dike and slurry wall; and (2) how the distribution of hydraulic conductivity influences <br />ground-water flow in the detention basin. These questions are addressed in the discussion of the planimetric <br />model. <br /> <br />The second model is a cross-sectional ground-water and solute-transport model (along segment X- Y <br />of section W-Z, fig. 4). It is designed to analyze the sensitivity of several aquifer and transport properties, <br />to (1) determine which properties greatly affect the flow and dissolved-solids distribution in the detention <br />basin, and (2) describe the conditions under which the proposed slurry wall would work most effectively. <br /> <br />The third model is an expansion of the second model to include downgradient areas from the slurry <br />wall to Las Vegas Wash. with modifications to the program to incorporate seasonal variations in <br />evapotranspiration at.the water table. Field-estimated properties were included in a simulation of flow and <br />solutes to replicate conditions prior to construction of the slurry wall and to project how a proposed slurry <br />wall might affect flow and transport in the study area. ' <br /> <br />Figure II shows both a vertically exaggerated (A) and a true-scale section (no vertical exaggeration; <br />B) through the Whitney area that is used in the latter two models, with the proposed slurry wall included. <br />The vertical scale is exaggerated to show the flow and dissolved-solids distributions produced by the <br />simulations, <br /> <br />Before the development of each conceptual model is discussed, the numerical technique used to <br />express the conceptual model in mathematicaltenns is presented. In addition. some definitions that describe <br />transport phenomena are given. <br /> <br />Mathematical Modeling Technique Used <br /> <br />The computer program used to simulate flow and transport of solutes in the conceptual models is <br />known as SUTRA (Saturated-Unsaturated TRAnsport), a U.S. Geological Survey numerical model <br />developed by Voss (1984). Analytical models, although exact, are greatly limited in their application <br />primarily because of their inherent simplistic boundary conditions and restriction to linear problems. <br />SUTRA employs standard finite-element approximations for the governing equations describing fluid mass, <br />solute mass, and energy. This program was selected over others for the analysis of ground-water flow and <br />dissolved-solids transport in the Whitney area for several reasons: <br /> <br />I. The program allows for geometric flexibility in application of boundary conditions and variable <br />grid spacing. <br /> <br />-25- <br />