Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />C~~ <br />"oJ <br />N <br />c:..; <br />C <br /> <br /><. <br /> <br />The second source of recharge is surface water that enters the detention basin at the north side of the <br />dike from the Monson Road floodway, and treated effluent in the flood plain adjacent to the wash (fig, 3), <br />The quantity of surface-water inflow to the study area probably is similar in volume to ground-water inflow <br />on a yearly average. but varies more widely from season to season than ground-water inflow. Floodway <br />flow and discharge of treated effluent are significantly greater during summer months when water use is <br />aI its peak. Estimated inflow to the detention basin ranges from 0.2 to 0.8 ft3ts, and has a yearly average <br />of about 0.5 ft3ts (inflows can be much higher during stonn events [D. Art Tuma. D,S, Bureau of <br />Reclamation, oral commun" 1987]). Surface-water inflow provides water for vigorous hydrophyte growth <br />in the eastern part of the detention basin (fig. 3). <br /> <br />Additional inflow to the detention basin along Tropicana floodway is substantiall,.h\lt because the <br />flood way is on the downgradient side of the detention basin and all the inflow leaves thfough an outflow <br />structure farther to the east (fig. 3), its significance as a source of recharge to the study area is minimal. <br />However, the Tropicana flood way does act as a sink for shallow ground water (Jess than 5 ft below land <br />surface) within the detention basin. <br /> <br />Discharge from the Detention Basin <br /> <br />To estimate discharge from the detention basin, time-dependent physical processes affecting discharge <br />need to be identified. These processes are important in developing an accurate conceptual model that will <br />be used to simulate potential hydrogeologic effects of the proposed slurry wall. The quantity of discharge <br />from the detention basin varies greatly from season to season, primarily owing to evapotranspiration--the <br />main process by which water leaves the study area. Other sources of discharge include ground-water <br />outflow beneath the dike structure and surface-water flow through outlet structures in the south side of the <br />dike. Additional drainage of the aquifer occurs along the Tropicana floodway (fig. 3) when ground-water <br />levels are above the excavated level of the channel. 'lbe total quantity of ground-water outflow is the most <br />important source of discharge to estimate, because ground water is responsible for transporting appreciable <br />dissolved-solids loads to the wash. <br /> <br />Evapotranspiration greatly influences the quantity of ground water that leaves the detention basin, <br />Water levels generally are from 2 to 6 ft below land surface in the western pari of the area. and range from <br />o to 4 ft in the eastern part of the area. These shallow water levels are ideal for pbreatophyte and <br />hydrophYle communities to thrive. Hydrophytes occupy the eastern part of the area (fig, 3) where inflow <br />from the Monson Road floodway and flood plain provides enough water to inundate the area with several <br />inches of water during periods of low evapotranspiration; surface water often flows through the detention <br />basin in small stream channels occupying topographically low areas. Upgradient from the inlet structure, <br />in a topographically higher area. pbreatophytes dominate, Evapotranspiration is greatest during summer <br />months, when plants are thriving and temperatures are high (fig. 7). The lowest recorded water levels at <br />most wells coincide with this period of high evapotranspiration. From September to early March. when <br />much of the vegetation is donnant, water levels rise, reaching their peak between January and March. <br />Figures 8 and 9 show the seasonal water-level fluctuations at selected well sites in areas dominated by <br />hydrophytes and phreatophytes. Maximum yearly changes in water levels due to evapotranspiration range <br />from 3.5 ft in phreatophyte-dominated areas to 2.0 ft in hydrophyte-dominated areas, The smaller net <br />change in the hydrophyte areas probably is due to the influx of surface water that buffers the water-level <br />response caused by evapotranspiration, <br /> <br />-19- <br />