|
<br />maintenance pfOblem of contwlling the regwwth of
<br />vegetation in the cleared floodway and along the
<br />main conveyance channel. The answer to the re-
<br />gwwth pwblem was to develop a program of control
<br />of regwwth fwm those phreatophytes previously
<br />cleared and new reseeding gfOwth which could be
<br />normally expected. This program was set up around
<br />the use of chemicals I using both airplane and ground
<br />application methods.
<br />Aedal spraying of floodways and other salt cedar
<br />control areas was accomplished by contract with
<br />Western Flying Service of Clovis, New Mexico.
<br />Specifications called for the use of formulas con-
<br />taining 2,4-D amine, and low volatile esters of
<br />2,4-0 and 2,4,S-T, diesel oil, emulsifier and water.
<br />Not less than 5 gallons of specified mixtures were
<br />applied to each acre. Treatments were given July
<br />1953, September 1953 and July 1954, allowing a
<br />minimum of 42 days regrowth between applications.
<br />Spmying operations pwvided for applications of
<br />chemicals to four units of matured phreatophyte
<br />growth located in certain bosque areas between
<br />Bemardo and Nogal Canyon and appwximately 5,000
<br />acres of cleared floadway in the San Marcial area.
<br />During the three periods for spray applications a
<br />total of appwximately 25,000 acres were treated
<br />under the Bureau contract for aerial spraying.
<br />During this same period, July 1953, the Bureau of
<br />Reclamation cooperated with the State of New Mexico
<br />in establishing a program of phreatophyte control
<br />in other areas along the Rio Grande. Similar spec~
<br />ifications were prepared and the same contractor
<br />handled the aerial spraying work under the State
<br />conhact. A total of 4,500 acres were treated three
<br />times.
<br />To check on the effectiveness of spraydistdbution
<br />over the treated areas and to analyze the results of
<br />the work, three steps were taken. First, in order to
<br />determine scope of coverage, each area was inspect~
<br />ed within 30 days after applications were made. The
<br />vegetation which had received adequate amounts of
<br />chemical was identified by the appearance of ep-
<br />inasty, generally occurring at the tips of the gmwth.
<br />The second step consisted of collection of root
<br />samples from the various areas for laboratory tests
<br />for carbohydrate food reserve analysis. Samples; of
<br />course, were taken from both treated and untreated
<br />areas for comparison. The last and possibly most
<br />conclusive check was a field inspection of spray
<br />areas to determine the degree of top kill and basal
<br />regrowth generally occurring within 60 days of treat-
<br />ment.
<br />We are fortunate in having weed control special~
<br />ists from the Agricultural Research Service, U. S.
<br />Dept. of Agriculture, in addition to those from the
<br />Bureau, Regional and Washington Offices, to help
<br />us evaluate the results of the weed control program
<br />thus far., The results from all airplane-sprayed
<br />tracts of matured phreatophytes were found to be
<br />
<br />34
<br />
<br />,
<br />,
<br />i~
<br />
<br />quite similar. Two or more repeated spray treat-
<br />ments gave a high percentage top kill and genemlly
<br />not much more than 50% plant kill and as Soon as
<br />treatment was discontinued the phreatophyte gmwth
<br />recovered to original density within 1 or 2 years
<br />particularly in those areas where river over~flow
<br />provided an annual irrigation.
<br />
<br />It now appears that best results of aefial treatment
<br />of matured phreatophytes cannot be accomplished
<br />without removal of the dead canopy, which will fa-
<br />cilitate the applications of chemicals to basal re.
<br />growth. Our experience thus far indicates little was
<br />gained by the use of 2,4-D and mixtures of esters of
<br />D and T on the treatment of mature salt cedar. It
<br />would appear, however, that the iso-octyl esters
<br />(brushkiller) gave us a better top kill on willows.
<br />A treatment of 725 acres of mixed phreatophyte
<br />growth sprayed under the State Engineer's contract,
<br />using 5 gallons to the acre containing 2 pounds of
<br />amine, 1 gallon of nontoxic oil, as a substitute for
<br />diesel oil, and the balance of water give the best over~
<br />all kill accomplished so far. In this area the bac-
<br />chafis had expefienced a 100% kill and willow and
<br />cottonwood 80% and the salt cedar about 80% top kill
<br />and 50% plant kill on matured plants.
<br />
<br />Contwl of phreatophyte regmwth and seedlings
<br />within the mechanically cleared floodway areas was
<br />more effective than in the mature phreatophyte areas.
<br />Plant kill has been considered very good, ranging
<br />from poor in some few areas to excellent in other
<br />areas. The pom kills appeared to be correlated with
<br />heavy rain showers, which occurred immediately
<br />following spray operations. ,We have also observed
<br />that better plant kill is accomplished after regrowth
<br />has obtained a height of about 18 inches.
<br />We are in process of modifying the program of
<br />phreatophyte contwl to include a plan pfOviding for
<br />alternate mechanical clearing, using heavy gang disk
<br />plows and ground application of chemicals, principally
<br />2,4-D amine. This change of procedure is being
<br />done in hopes of gaining time on ultimate complete
<br />control of floadway regrowth with its reduction of
<br />water use. Application of the chemicals will be
<br />accomplished by the use of a heavy duty large vol~
<br />ume gwund spray dg pulled by a tfactOf. It is plan-
<br />ned also to initiate a re..seeding program through
<br />which we may be able to establish various types
<br />of grasses throughout the control areas. Control
<br />in the mature salt cedar areas would be accomplished
<br />by somewhat similar methods.
<br />In addition to the use of presently available herbi-
<br />cidal hormones for phreatophyte control, we are also
<br />working in cooperation with various chemical com~
<br />panies on experimental control of salt cedar in test
<br />plots with the use of new Urea Herbicides.
<br />From the amount of salt cedar, etc., that exists on
<br />the Rio Grande and its tributaries, we can expect
<br />the pfOblem of phreatophyte contwl to be with us Cm
<br />a long time to come. Of course, we are always hope-
<br />
<br />.~.
<br />
<br />':.~.
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />'~
<br />
<br />'-~"
<br />
<br />,~~$j
<br />
<br />;~:
<br />'.~~j
<br />
<br />~j
<br />;tJ.
<br />
<br />,-.-,'.
<br />~~~:~
<br />,'-)
<br />
<br />~. 1
<br />Lj
<br />
<br />.,.
<br />;~.J
<br />,...:.:
<br />
<br />:-.;;~
<br />i..?~~
<br />;~f:
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />;"; ,'. '::'.~ {' 0
<br />.~ ,...~....VN
<br />
|