Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />002899 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />streams. During the Spring runoff study when suspended solids concentrations <br />were relatively high, the calcium and magnesium concentrations together were <br />not equal to the total hardness determined in the field by EDTA titration <br />(see Table 3). The higher hardness values obtained by titration are likely <br />due to the presence of sign i fi cant concentrati ons of the other hardness- <br />producing metals (especially iron) associated with the suspended solids. <br />This explanation is especially plausible since no inhibitors were used in <br />the EDTA titration procedure. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Alkalinity <br /> <br />Alkalinity is a measurement of the buffering capacity of the carbonate- <br />bicarbonate system present in surface waters. It is important that sufficient <br />alkalinity exist in streams to prevent wide fluctuations in pH which may <br />be harmful to the aquatic environment. Stream measurements indicated a <br />widespread range of total alkalinity concentrations as CaC03, ranging from <br />40 mg/l near the headwaters to 175 mg/l near Rangely, Colorado (see the <br />profiles in Fig. 7). Alkalinity measurements were generally highest <br />during the "low flow" period. The lower Milk Creek station (MC-20) <br />exhibited an average alkalinity concentration of 331 mg/l as CaC03, while <br />Yellow Creek (YC-3) contained an average alkalinity of more than 1500 mg/l <br />as CaC03 during each study. period. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Salinity <br /> <br />High salinity (TDS) concentrations may produce adverse effects in <br />drinking water supplies and in irrigated crops. A large effort is currently <br />underway by the Colorado River Basin Salinity Forum (1975) to mitigate <br />these impacts by reducing salinity in the Colorado River basin, including <br />the White River. As shown in Fig. 8 the White River in its lower reaches <br />becomes a significant carrier of salinity, a fact shown most clearly by <br />the salinity increases measured during "low flow". At that time (Fan, <br />1975) the salinity near the headwaters averaged 123 mg/l, while in the 200 km <br />(125 mil reach downstream to Rangely this concentration increased by more <br />than four times to 557 mg/l. Mean TDS concentrations exceeded the criteria <br />of 500 mg/l in the White River near Rangely (RM 78.2), and in Yellow Creek, <br />Little Beaver Creek, Mi 11 er Creek, Big Beaver Creek, and Mil k Creek. The <br />greatest incremental increase in salinity concentrations in the White River <br />(80%) occurred in the 38.8 km (24.1 mil reach between Buford (WR-ll) <br />and Meeker (WR-6), which includes the tributaries Miller Creek and Coal <br />Creek/Little Beaver Creek. This stream reach also includes the tributaries <br />Curtis Creek and Flag Creek (which were not sampled), and the 'iMeeker <br />Dome" area which has been previously documented as a significant source <br />of highly-sal ine groundwater and surface runoff (EPA, 1972). Unfortunately, <br />the scope of the present study did not allow an intensive investigation of <br />the non-point sources of salinity in this area. The data from the Fall <br />"low flow" study does show, however, that only approximately 50% of the <br />increase in salinity load in the White River between stations WR-ll and <br />WR-6 (58 metric tons per day) could be attributed to tributary loads <br />(excluding Flag Creek, which was not sampled, and Curtis Creek, which <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'il,,) <br />