Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~e $an Diego <br /> <br />ltnion.~ribune. <br /> <br />FRIDAY. DECDIBER 12, 199i 8-12 <br /> <br />Sew up the deal <br /> <br />JIWD must agree to Teali.stic water Tates <br /> <br />1515 <br /> <br />The landmark deal for Imperial <br />Valley to sell San Diego Coun- <br />ty 200.000 acre-feet of water <br />a year changes the future wa- <br />ter supply for the region. <br />It provides San Diego County with an <br />independent, reliable supply of new wa- <br />ter for 75 years in the future from <br />water conserved by Imperial Valley <br />farmers. And it eventually could help <br />bring more water to all of Southern <br />California. <br />But that's only if the Metropolitan <br />'~Va[er District. the county's Los An- <br />geles-based water <br />'.'v'holesaler. wil1 <br />agree to sensible <br />rates for piping our <br />new water through <br />the ;\1WO's Colora- <br />do River Aqueduct. <br />If the MWD keeps <br />trying to thwart <br />the Imperial Valley <br />deal by proposing <br />ridiculously high Bruce Babbitt <br />rates for using its aqueduct, it will <br />thwart water progress for all of <br />Southern California. <br />Here's wh>': All the states that use <br />:olorado River water, and the federal <br />~ovemment, are demanding that Cali- <br />~.ornia live within its 4.4 million acre. <br />:eet annual allotment. For years, the <br />3tate has been taking as much as 5.2 <br />milJion-acre feet. the extra coming from <br />unused allotments of other states. All <br />..he extra is taken by the MWD. <br />The San Diego County.lmperial Val- <br />lev deal v..;ll be a giant step toward <br />:,~ducmg Southern California's intake of <br />'':olorado River water. <br />aut if the ~1\VD won't pla:- ball, other <br />3tates and t~e federal government will <br /> <br /> <br />believe, and rightly so, that the MWD <br />isn't serious about living within its Colo. <br />rado River allotment. And, if that hap- <br />pens, the other Colorado River states <br />and Northern California will probably <br />oppose plans to fIx the Bay-Delta, a <br />crucial project for Southern California's <br />water supply. <br />U Southern California is e\'er to re- <br />ceive more water from Northern Cali- <br />fornia, the water flow through the Sac. <br />ramento-San Joaquin River Delta and <br />San Francisco Bay must be flXed. Cur- <br />rent pumping operations are slowly kill- <br />ing the Bay.Delta. A major state-federal <br />project to fix the Bay- Delta is under <br />way, but it must receive fWIding from <br />Congress. <br />U elected officials from Northern Cal- <br />ifornia and other Colorado River states <br />think Southern California isn't serious <br />about reducing its Colorado River in. <br />take, the>"ll oppose the Bay-Delta plan. <br />That would be very bad for the future of <br />our reglOn. <br />Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt <br />must step in immediately and encour. <br />age the ~lWD to go along v.;th the San <br />Diego County.lmperial Valley deal. Po- <br />litical pressure from the governor and <br />the Legislature also must be brought to <br />bear. <br />This new water deal v..il1 be the model <br />for future transfers from agriculture to <br />cities in California. And it will benefit all <br />of Southern California by sho....-ing ev- <br />eryone else that we can live within our <br />water allotment. <br />But that can happen onJy if the MWD <br />realizes its responsibility to Southern <br />California water reliability and agrees <br />to realistic rates for using its aqueduct. <br />Federal and state officials need to r:1.ake <br />sure it does. <br />